On Jul 8, 2009, at 4:16 PM, Al Poulin wrote:
> > On Jul 7, 12:40 pm, John Martz <zjo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> VideoLan is somewhat amazing to me. Given all the (video) players out >> there from all the different companies, the only one I have had a >> consistently good experience with is VideoLan. >> >> To fall back on a perhaps over used phrase, it just "works". At >> least for me. > > To use VideoLan, do you trash all other video player plug ins? Or do > they just live peacefully side by side? If there are more than one > video player, which takes precedence? VideoLan is an application, not a plug-in, and so precedence is like every other application on a Mac. It is determined by what the file metadata says, that is, what you see as the default program when you do 'Get Info' on a file. It's no different than having both Photoshop and Graphics Converter, or Firefox and Safari on your Mac. Embedded players will still use whatever Quicktime plugins that are present on your Mac. -- Bruce Johnson University of Arizona College of Pharmacy Information Technology Group Institutions do not have opinions, merely customs --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs. The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
