On Sep 9, 2:34 pm, Len Gerstel <[email protected]> wrote:

> 1) The apps are not dual processor aware. Most apps are. Even VLC  
> player is and will split the load across the 2 processors of a dual.
>
> 2) You are not doing anything with these systems while the apps are  
> running. Since they do not appear to be dual processor aware, they  
> are running at about 100% utilization on one processor, and the other  
> is sitting near 0% I bet.

actually, you lose.  where do i go to collect?  ;o)  i wouldn't
presume to guess whether the apps are dual processor aware or if the
OS distributes the work, but if i view the activity monitor on the DP
machine while a single job is running, first one processor is 75%
maxed out while the other is near 25% activity, then it flip-flops and
the other is 75% maxed out while the first is near 25% activity.  the
frequency of the flip-flops is about twice per second.  if i run two
jobs simultaneously, both processors stay 100% maxed out
continuously.  and as you might expect, on the SP machine, the
activity monitor shows the one CPU 100% maxed out continuously.

differences in viewing video, as you describe, is (this time i'll
wager) more a function of the video card processor speed and memory,
not the main CPU processor speed.  it really surprises me how often
folks need reminded that a chain is only as strong (fast) as it
weakest (slowest) link.  why are CPUs are like quarterbacks . . . ?
they either get all the credit or all the blame, and usually deserve
neither.

john
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to