just one small point, to a certain extent, you're comparing apples and oranges, because IIRC, the QS/733 was one of the CPUs apple put out with no backside cache. that makes a big difference. again, IIRC, the DA/733s were much faster than the QS/733s for that very reason.
On Sep 8, 5:17 pm, "Mac User #330250" <[email protected]> wrote: > > In oposition to what Bruce wrote: > My computer _was_ a Quicksilver 2001, single 733 MHz. > I then got a 1.4 GHz OWC Mercury Extreme, running Mac OS X 10.4.11 on it with > various applications (Photoshop, just to name one). I did (as I always do) > switch alot between the running processes. > I then replaced it with the original Dual 800 MHz for this QS2001. The > subjective feeling was that Mac OS X responded much faster to task switching > and was generally more responsive. . . . > Cheers, > Andreas. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs. The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml To post to this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
