On Feb 19, 2010, at 6:46 AM, Bill Connelly wrote:

> 
> On Feb 19, 2010, at 2:11 AM, Clark Martin wrote:
> 
>> On 2/18/10 10:41 PM, deadwinter wrote:
>>> Hi folks:
>>> 
>>> I thought I had a partition for 10.2 and another for OS9.2, but upon
>>> closer examination it looks like I have OS 10.2 and a folder labeled
>>> OS9 applications, OS 9 System, etc.  In the "Startup Disk" control
>>> panel, I can choose that the system use the OS9 system folder, which
>>> will make it boot into OS9, and viceversa.
>>> 
>>> Can someone enlighten me as to why the previous owner would run it
>>> like this as opposed to there being two separate partitions?  Do I
>>> gain anything?  Lose anything?
>> 
>> Usually, on a Mac list, that easiest way to generate a lot of e-mail 
>> messages is to ask about, suggest, or otherwise bring up partitioning. 
>> You'll get those who swear the more partitions the better and those who 
>> insist there is no point in more than one.  This goes back to pre OS 9 days, 
>> the OS 9 / X partitioning question just added more fuel to the fire.
>> 
>> That said, for what it's worth.  The bulk of my systems are single 
>> partition.  All the machines I've set up with X and 9 have had both on one 
>> partition and it has worked just fine for me.  It's easy to install and 
>> switch between them.
>> 
>> I don't like to partition unless I have to because it reduces flexibility.  
>> I'd hate to have to go and copy a couple of partitions to another disk then 
>> re-partition the disk then copy things back because one got full.  It's 
>> enough of a pain when the whole disk runs out of room.
> 
> I would be concerned of booting or starting up in OS 9 (which, when in a 
> folder on the same partition, you may not be able to do???), and things being 
> changed on the partition under OS 9, and then restarting under OS X and X 
> being messed up. If you just used OS 9 as a Classic OS (starting up through 
> OS X), I feel that would be ok.
> 
> I really don't know ... but I admit ... I am a Partition Addict:
> 
> OS X 10.5
> OS X 10.4
> OS 9.2.2
> Apps
> Docs
> 
> There. I said it (again). (Any "Hi Bill"'s out there?)
> 
> I believe such a scheme messes up OS X's natural ability to manage the unused 
> space ... not sure about this ... Gurus?
> 
No fear necessary.
John Carmonne
Yorba Linda USA




-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list

Reply via email to