> >> Point taken John. But I could swear each list had a set of rules that
> >> allowed rule discussion as legit content of discussion.
and you would be exactly correct!
> > Rule discussion is rarely legit and usually ignored.
and you would also be exactly correct!
> > I cannot agree with either proposition.
and I don't either!
> That would put LEM on an equal footing ...
It makes sense to me to have discussions on the list in question, so the
readers of that list can read it.
For what it is worth, I know nothing of any sort of LEMLIST and hope not to
need to.
Adrian, you have demonstrated wise and reasoned commentary and I thank you for
it, but could you please stop for a short minute and tell me how someone could
complain about my asking about the possible hiding of webcam remote viewing
software on ANY OF OUR MACs!
I try very hard to be fair even in view of those willing to bend the rules, I
want our NON-INTEL, NON-TINKERING, basically stock Mac G list to thrive for at
least the next 10 years.
By that time, we will have expired and when I arrive at the Golden Gates above,
I am hopping that some tagger has been there to mark them MAC and MAC.
JML
--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list
