On Mar 6, 2010, at 12:16 AM, Clark Martin wrote:

> On 3/5/10 9:56 PM, Peter Kim wrote:
>> I remember trying to get 1.5 Mb/s DSL 7 years ago, through SBC, now
>> AT&T, in suburban Chicago.  I found out that I was too far away from the
>> new optical fiber install, and had to settle for 768/256Kbs- the houses
>> across the street could get up to 3 Mb/s.  Ugh, I can't believe we're
>> still talking about the same issues in this country- 7 years later.  I
>> was eventually able to get a 3 Mb/s line, now considered the middle
>> package- but please, with optical fiber that's theoretically equivalent
>> to child's play.  Clear and Sprint WiMax look pretty good at this point.
>> 
> 
> My DSL was supposed to be good for 1.5 MBps / 256 KBps IIRC.  I was only 
> getting maybe half that.  I'm out on the edge of coverage but not far enough 
> out to be near a B-Box.  When I was having trouble with the service the tech 
> said with the line I had I couldn't get any faster service.  So I signed up 
> with Cable.  I had held off going that route because I don't like the cable 
> company, but...
> 
> I kind of wish I'd signed up a little sooner, all those linux distro 
> downloads would have been much faster.
> 
> 


I have DSL at my shop and cable at home and cable rules hands down.The only 
trouble in my area is Time warner is the only one so they charge what they 
think they can get.
We need competition in this OC market.

John Carmonne
Yorba Linda USA






-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list

Reply via email to