Yes, it will fit. Yes, it will be much faster. But you don't gain terribly much from it. It's still an old G4, and it won't blaze along at very many things. If you want speed, just pony up $100, buy a faster P4 desktop, and OSX86 the thing. Sent from a computer running either the SPARC, Itanium, or PowerPC architecture.
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Peter Haas <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Aug 6, 2010, at 7:12 AM, Geke wrote: > > 1. How tricky is it to put the DA's CPU into the Gigabit? The CPU is >> the same, but I read that "the location of the CPU card on machines >> previous to the digital audio would require some modifications to the >> motherboard/case". >> (The other way I can manage; I have the Sonnet instructions for >> putting in the Encore.) >> >> > The Giga-Designs processor upgrades were designed from the outset to fit in > either processor position: the old position as found in the Gigabit Ethernet > G4s or the new position as found in the Digital Audio and Quicksilver G4s. > Giga does this by having a two-position processor cooler, and an innovative > board layout which accommodates the special need of the Gigabit Ethernet for > access to its optical/ZIP drive PATA channel. > > The Giga-Designs processors were also designed for easy changes from a 100 > MHz bus machine to a 133 MHz bus machine. > > I don't know if Encore offers this same flexibility. > > > > 2. What do I gain by this swap? I mean, the DA is a bit newer and >> faster, but is it worth it, or should I just switch to the Gigabit? >> - I have already tried the DA's video card in the Gigabit and it works >> OK; does it make a big difference that the DA is AGPx4 and the Gigabit >> AGPx2? >> - The RAM in both computers is PC-133 >> - Does the slower ATA bus speed of the Gigabit make a big difference >> in actual practice? >> > > It can make a difference, but that difference is probably somewhere in the > neighborhood of 150 minutes to do a complex DVD authoring/mastering job on a > Gigabit Ethernet (100 MHz bus, an slower ATA channel) to 120 minutes to do > the same job on a Digital Audio or a Quicksilver (133 MHz bus and faster ATA > channel). > > In stark contrast, a Shuttle SP35 OSx86 Hackintosh can do that same DVD > authoring/mastering job in 12 minutes ... a 10-to-1 improvement in > "wall-cock-time", which is certainly one important measure of performance. > > I still retain 133 MHz bus G4s for ordinary work (such as web access and > Mail.app access, for which a 133 MHz bus and a dual 1.0 GHz G4 processor is > certainly satisfactory). > > All the "heavy lifting" in my shop is now run on OSx86 Hackintoshes with, > variously, 800 MHz to 1600 MHz buses and dual or quad Intel processors in > the very high 2 MHz to low 3 MHz range (Pentium Dual-Core E6700 3.2 GHz, but > over-clockable to 3.8 GHz to Core 2 Quad Q9550 2.83 GHz, but over-clockable > to 3.4 GHz; however, I rarely operate my processors over-clocked, preferring > reliability over excessive stress on the various components). > > > > -- > You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for > those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power > Macs. > The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our > netiquette guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list > -- You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs. The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml To post to this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list
