At 3:24 PM +0000 10/22/2010, Wallace Adrian D'Alessio
wrote:
Yeah, NAND cycles and SD vs HD is what this thread is about and not the fact that I was inspired by " LION" and Apple/Jobs going deep to the dark side is what this is about
I think Apple is simply responding to customer desires, good or
bad.
People want laptops that are more rugged and have better battery
life. Currently, the HD is a problem - it is fragile and a power
pig. So replacing it with SSD makes sense.
WRT the life of the device... Remember, these machines use Intel
parts - so they are simply not designed to have a life beyond 3 years
or so. For the *average* user that is overstocked with RAM,
paging to the SSD will be minimal. And since those users only do
a trivial amount of photo editing... probably the SSD will be
ok, at least for the life of their AppleCare contract.
At 3:30 PM +0000 10/22/2010, Wallace Adrian D'Alessio
wrote:
Well oh yeah, I'll tell you what you can do with your turning the thread about the complexities of Apple going to the dark side and hurting low enders from the real meaning of SD versus HDs and the NANO cycles etc. Much more important that you poor people concerned about how you can make money if Apple keeps up their S*it!
SD vs HD is the crux of modern economics don't you GET it you indigent B77tard!
The discussion of SSD vs HD is legit - it's going to be a BIG
part of Lion's "standard" environment.
Threads drift. Get over it.
- Dan.
--
- Psychoceramic Emeritus; South Jersey, USA, Earth.
--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list
