On Jan 28, 2011, at 12:49 AM, James Therrault wrote:
That's what I suspected.
I think that a 27" might be a limiting factor but still, it would
provide a good deal more real estate...
Remember, it's pixels that count, not physical size. You can buy a
gigantic 52" HDTV and only have a resolution of 1920x1080, and right
now, the smallest 1920x1080 screen I'm aware of comes on a 16" laptop
display, and that's still not as high a pixel density as the iPhone
4's "retinal" display which is the current "record holder". The new
iPad2 is supposed to be 2560x1920 which will quadruple the pixel count
of the current iPad's 1280x960. The iPad2 should be another fantastic
product I suspect.
--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list
