Hitachi seems to be doing very well. I have a 1TB drive in my Quad G5
that works fantastically, with 64MB! cache. Paid $129ish for it last
year; got it from a local parts store. Better than the old IBM
DeathStars they inherited.

Either way, I'd take 1TB/64M/7200 over 2TB/32M/7200. Most important is
the rev speed followed by the cache. I want to upgrade to a 10K drive,
but none are cheap and work with my beloved Gs.

On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:35 PM, Dan <[email protected]> wrote:
> At 5:14 PM -0500 1/31/2011, John Callahan wrote:
>>
>> why would a 32 MB cache, same drive, be cheaper than a 16MB cache drive?
>
> As technology advances the newer components end up being less expensive than
> the older.
>
> But really, HD pricing has very little to do with specifications, these
> days.  It's all about sales, rebates, and volume - and vendors betting that
> consumers are too stoopid to google around.
>
> - Dan.
> --
> - Psychoceramic Emeritus; South Jersey, USA, Earth.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for
> those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power
> Macs.
> The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our
> netiquette guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list
>



-- 
Sent from a computer running either the SPARC, Itanium, or PowerPC architecture.

-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list

Reply via email to