On Mar 27, 2011, at 10:05 AM, Dan wrote: > No, I've tried them on faster machines too. The problem is not the speed at > which the page is generated or displayed. The problem is that they *reduce* > the amount of signal on the page. Need Input!
Well they'e an index of pages, not the page itself. (and I'm not sure I understand what you meed by 'need input', I guess.) It depends on your needs; on a top site page, there's a lot of useful signal. It is a quick index into recent sites based on what is possibly the best human sense: our visual acuity and ability to quickly identify even degraded images correctly. And coverflow is intuitively usable by anyone whose ever flipped through a bin of CD's or LP's. If I don't remember a file name (or they're all named P324456 and such) using Coverflow to quickly browse a folder full of images is invaluable, and very quick. -- Bruce Johnson "Wherever you go, there you are" B. Banzai, PhD -- You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs. The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml To post to this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list
