On May 10, 2012, at 6:11 PM, Doug McNutt wrote:

> 
> The idea that all mail should be IMAPped HTML  and opened with all of the 
> links automatically read is just silly. The advertisers and spammers are the 
> only folks who gain anything from it.

IMAP vs POP has nothing to do with the HTML stuff and spammers.

Spam is easily contained...my junk mail folder (which I leave to fill until I 
empty it) currently contains 19 spams that escaped our spam filtering system on 
our mail server, going back to the middle of April.

I've had maybe one or two a week that gets past both the server-side and 
client-side filtering.

Last time I looked we were sending nearly 90% of all mail messages straight to 
the bitbucket, and this in an environment where emails mentioning online 
pharmacies and viagra could well be legitimate messages.

Once this system was set up it was pretty much automated, (for anyone who wants 
to know, we're using using amavis in conjunction with clamav and spam assassin 
+ RBL filters + some other stuff to do the trick, then passing the filtered 
mail from our SMTP servers to our IMAP mailstore running dovecot. I can provide 
exhaustive detail if anyone wants)

Maybe once a month someone complains that they didn't receive something and 
we'll find it in rejected emails, and either whitelist that sender or adjust 
the rules to fix it.

This is done for approximately a thousand users for about 0.1 FTE...ie: the 
person who runs our email system spends about 1/10th of his time doing that. 

-- 
Bruce Johnson
University of Arizona
College of Pharmacy
Information Technology Group

Institutions do not have opinions, merely customs


-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list

Reply via email to