I'm having a tough time keeping track of which data is which after analysis...

I can do a bunch of work customizing each tool and each workflow, renaming 
results etc.
But I think it might be a lot easier to manage if step names were based on the 
titles of the history items instead of "data 2" or whatever.

Has this been tried and rejected for some reason?
Would a pull request implementing this change be welcomed?

Am I just "doing it wrong"?
Any suggestions are welcome.


Brad Langhorst
New England Biolabs

Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:


Reply via email to