I would like to reiterate this point in as far as this single feature is preventing us from implementing large workflows in our organization in Galaxy...It is just not feasible to re-do all workflow steps each time in complex studies...

Is there any way we can speed up the implementation of this issue?

Thanks,

Thon

On May 18, 2012, at 05:44 AM, Jeremy Goecks <jeremy.goe...@emory.edu> wrote:

Nested workflows aren't yet possible, but they're definitely something we'd like to do in the future.

Best,
J.

On May 17, 2012, at 9:48 AM, Peter van Heusden wrote:

> Hi there
>
> Is there a way in Galaxy to use workflows as components in workflows?
> I've got two datasets that start as Genbank files and are processed
> (features extracted, translated to AA) by a small workflow, and then
> BLASTed against one another. Ideally I'd like to modularise the initial
> steps as a workflow so that I can say input data goes through this
> workflow and then the result is fed into either the query or the subject
> slot of blastp. So is this possible?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Peter
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
> in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this
> and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:
>
> http://lists.bx.psu.edu/


___________________________________________________________
Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:

http://lists.bx.psu.edu/
___________________________________________________________
Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:

  http://lists.bx.psu.edu/

Reply via email to