On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:13 PM, James Taylor <ja...@jamestaylor.org> wrote:
> Peter, I quite like this idea, and I think it might be possible to do as a
> simple extension to the validator framework. Basically, a flag indicating
> that failing a certain validation would be able to be considered a warning
> rather than an error. Or, allow a validator to return a sentinel indicating
> warning vs error.

The current validator framework works at a single parameter level
(right?), but yes, generalising that somehow would probably work.

I agree that warning vs error as a severity flag makes perfect sense.


Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:


Reply via email to