On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Greg Von Kuster <g...@bx.psu.edu> wrote:
> I know this has been needed for quite some time.  I't's definitely
> on our near radar.

Excellent - can we move that Trello card to "In Planning"? ;)

> I'm thinking that testing repositories of type
> tool_dependency_definition would cover this request ...

Yes, that's the main missing piece.

> ... since any
> repositories that have bot tools and a tool_dependencies.xml file
> are already tested.

Here the tool_dependencies.xml file isn't tested explicitly,
only indirectly via wrapper tests which use the dependency.

> Will this be an appropriate approach to this,
> or am I missing something here?

I would prefer improved testing/reporting from the
tool_dependencies.xml actions be universal for any
Tool Shed repository containing a tool_dependencies.xml
file -- not just the restricted tool_dependency_definition
type which only contain this file.

I gave an example on the Trello Card.


Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:

To search Galaxy mailing lists use the unified search at:

Reply via email to