On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Peter Cock <p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Dave Bouvier <d...@bx.psu.edu> wrote:
>> Peter,
>> Thanks for pointing this out, I've applied your changes in
>> 12478:15fc8675064e on the default branch.
>>    --Dave B.
> Thanks Dave,
> RE: http://lists.bx.psu.edu/pipermail/galaxy-dev/2014-February/018154.html
> https://bitbucket.org/galaxy/galaxy-central/commits/15fc8675064ea46b7e081d9643393be354f07d65
> I'm still digging into the underlying problem, by focussing on just
> one unit test ...
> As a workaround, I could probably provide expected data for all
> four output files...

I've been talking to John (off list), he will reply here later, but in
the meantime pointed me at a relevant commit,

Basically the current Twill tests are extremely fragile and expect the
test output files in the same order used in the <outputs> definitions
and also there must be sample data for ALL the output files.

(I may have hit this bug before, I forget now).


Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:

To search Galaxy mailing lists use the unified search at:

Reply via email to