I guess I should have included my system information; just didn't think about it being relevant at the time. Obviously, though, it is.
System Info: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.40GHz, 1G RAM Mageia 3, Kernel 3.10.54 (KDE4) Gambas 3.5.4 Free Pascal Compiler version 2.6.4 [2014/03/07] for i386 Interestingly, closing my web browser gave me better performance with both, but still a roughly 2:1 difference: Pascal program compiled with `fpc polynom.pas` and then timed: real 0m22.445s user 0m20.875s sys 0m0.014s Gambas program executed with `time gbs3 -f -c polynom.gambas`: real 0m11.303s user 0m10.297s sys 0m0.035s Lee On 10/11/2014 02:37 PM, Jussi Lahtinen wrote: > As you can see, my numbers are something completely different. My test was > done with Intel Core2 Quad @ 2.83 GHz. And the Pascal version was compiled > with "fpc polym.pas". > What kind of system ran the Gambas code in 18 seconds!? And yet, how did it > spend 7 times more time on the Pascal program than my system!? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer http://p.sf.net/sfu/Zoho _______________________________________________ Gambas-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
