Le 11/10/2014 21:49, T Lee Davidson a écrit : > Just to be clear, I did not run 'polynom.gambas' as a script with the > she-bang specifying to use 'gbs3' to execute it. That *is* slow. > > I executed it using gbs3 with the '-f' option invoking the JustInTime > compiler. > > I also just now used the IDE to create a command-line application based > on the benchmark, created an executable, and then ran that. That was > also so slow (almost 2 minutes to Print the first result) that I did not > let the timing test finish. > > So, it appears that the JIT compiler option is what makes the huge > difference -- on my system anyway. >
Ah ok, sounds more logical. Anyway, if you want to compare Gambas with a compiled language, you should use the JIT compiler. And you must not use it if you compare it with an interpreted-only language. Regards, -- Benoît Minisini ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer http://p.sf.net/sfu/Zoho _______________________________________________ Gambas-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
