Hello Benoit, Sorry if I let some criticism on the strategy gb.gui in this email. I state to be old and ignorant (to 16 years (1963) already around the world to work) and that I admire very much you and your collaborators, otherwise I would be silent. Ubuntu can represent for free software that Windows is for closed software. Ubuntu uses GTK and you love QT and that's OK. Gb.gui never completely properly worked, why insist? Is not better to abandon gb.gui, gb.gtk2, gb.gtk3 and focusing on those software that manage to combine the GTK with QT, explaining well the use to all shrimps, maybe helping them for installation? Thanks for the attention. Gianluigi
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight. http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y _______________________________________________ Gambas-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
