Il 27/04/2015 20:08, Tobias Boege ha scritto: > On Mon, 27 Apr 2015, Charlie Reinl wrote: >> Am Sonntag, den 26.04.2015, 14:39 +0200 schrieb Gian: >>> Il 24/04/2015 14:23, Gian ha scritto: >>>> Hello Benoit, >>>> Sorry if I let some criticism on the strategy gb.gui in this email. >>>> I state to be old and ignorant (to 16 years (1963) already around the >>>> world to work) and that I admire very much you and your collaborators, >>>> otherwise I would be silent. >>>> Ubuntu can represent for free software that Windows is for closed software. >>>> Ubuntu uses GTK and you love QT and that's OK. >>>> Gb.gui never completely properly worked, why insist? Is not better to >>>> abandon gb.gui, gb.gtk2, gb.gtk3 and focusing on those software that >>>> manage to combine the GTK with QT, explaining well the use to all >>>> shrimps, maybe helping them for installation? >>>> Thanks for the attention. >>>> Gianluigi >>>> >> >>> Hello Benoit, >>> I'm sorry if I offended you, it was not my intention. Quite the contrary. >>> I believe that the main feature of Gambas is the one that, with a few >>> clicks, we can get a GUI very effective and pleasant. >>> But if the GUI does not work... >>> I note that no one has commented on what I have written here, me wonder why? > > I, for one, have not received your messages. I only saw them now, cited by > Charlie. (?) > >>> Do not they use gb.gui (gb.gtk +)? >>> Do not they care if their code works with GTK? > > I stopped caring about Gambas + GTK back in 2009 when I, as a 14 year old, > simply found GTK to look bad on that old Ubuntu 9.04 -- and I remember that > it was not as complete as gb.qt4 on some things. > > I have seldom touched the combination since then because I was never > disappointed with gb.qt4. When I ran gb.gtk, it was (almost?) always only to > inspect incompatibilities others found with gb.qt4. I don't use gb.gui at > all. I always tick "Qt project" explicitly. > > Hans, whom I and two others write a book about Gambas with, quickly got on > the same track. Actually one of the first sentences a reader would see on > the front page of the book web site is that we consequently use gb.qt4 in > all the projects. > > The only shame is that we never get around to report and fix the > incompatibilities between gb.gtk(3) and gb.qt4 if everyone shut in before > gb.gtk like me... > >>> They use Gambas only for fun or theoretical study? >>> > > Yes, I do both and almost nothing except them. > > Regards, > Tobi >
Sorry Tobias I understand correctly? You're only 20 years? But you're very good my warmest congratulations. I know the German book despite the difficulties thanks to Google, I learned something. You who uses tricks to show good Qt in desktop Gtk? Regards Gianluigi ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight. http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y _______________________________________________ Gambas-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
