mixed would really rock, it means we will have to think before tasking bits and pieces. At 12:27 PM 12/29/2006, Thomas Ward wrote: >Hi all, >I've been doing allot of thinking about STFC 2.0, and I have decided >personally to redesign STFC 2.0 as a strictly TNG game. This means the >ships, bases, etc will be based on the STING series. >However, I have one question about this. On TNG they often attempted to >show off the new Galaxy class such as Enterprise and Yamato, but often >as not most of the ships seen on the show Hood, Magellan, Repulse, and >many others were based on the older Excelsior and Myranda-class designs. >The Ambassador-Class also made an appearance or two. >So the basic question is would you like your entire fleet comprised of >the Galaxy-class, or would you like the fleet to be more realistic being >made up of various different ships with different weapons payloads, >speeds, shielding sensors, etc. >Personally, I think the mixed fleet is more interesting. With the fleet >being mixed up it completely changes the tactical situation. An >Excelsior could easily face off with a Cardassian being of the same >general weapons payload and speed, could probably handle Klingons, but >would be really out gunned when taking on Romulans and Borg. >The Galaxy-class being the top-of-the-line for the series would of >course be the best for taking on the Romulans and Borg. Better >shielding, phasers, speed, more torpedoes, etc... >What do you all think. > > >_______________________________________________ >Gamers mailing list .. [email protected] >To unsubscribe send E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can visit >http://audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org to make >any subscription changes via the web.
_______________________________________________ Gamers mailing list .. [email protected] To unsubscribe send E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can visit http://audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org to make any subscription changes via the web.
