As tempting as it is to reply to this point by point, I really don't want to get into the rant thread that will no doubt ensue. All I'll say is that it's a case in point for Cara's thoughts on approaching the future armed to the teeth with positivity, and that something, how ever small, is always gonna be better than nothing for someone, somewhere.
Wow. Just wow. On 4/22/13, shaun everiss <[email protected]> wrote: > hi scot. > an interesting paper. > Ofcause if we are being noticed by the big companies especially > microsoft which is one of those that are huge there is hope. > However there is a difference from putting out yet another studdy, to > actually doing anything about it. > What for example is basic accessability? > basic could be defined that you can open, read the title, close the > program, and quit it. > it could also mean things like stereo sound for objects, maybe simple > target beeps, etc. > it doesn't mean though that menus are accessable or anything. > and while there is the ability even in graphical lanugages like unity > xna, etc to use speech on a wider scale bar the sports games basic > accessability is narator, ms magnifier, ms accessability frontends > in options on windows, text on screen, etc etc. > its not really accessability, its just crap. > I am not convinced that with the way ms did all its narators and its > so called accessability that it will even remotely help us. > unless we use windows xp for ever with pirated cracked keys and ms > office xp with the same keys. > all the new ribbons and then there is win9, just about everyone I > talk to in the industry down to my screen reader dealer says that > basically it will work but in reality win8 is crap and unstable and > stupid right now and to stay with 7 or even better xp. > with xp dieing 7 is probably the best we will get. > so when ms talk about accessability I am not sure if I should beleve > them or not. > not to mention we just get this now on a list for the little blind > people hidden away on some place on the net. > the fact is if this was really big news it would have appeared > offline on the news or in stores. > I don't mean to be critical but with the track record on ms > accessability and how they have mangled office and windows to make it > harder for us to use meaning we have to fiddle round is just not > sitting with me at all. > worse that paper is at least 6 months old. > 6 months is enough time for at least some small games to have come out. > no one cares about the poor blind. > this paper means nothing, or maybe its too soon. > My issue is that everyone is happy to concider things like this a > good idea, serveys, papers, the lot. > Vary few actually do anything. > with the acception of a few small developers on the audiogames forum. > no companies online or offline stores have even managed to get close. > maybe if one of the big gaming companies like nentendo or soni did > simular papers I'd actually hope this would work but no such luck. --- Gamers mailing list __ [email protected] If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to [email protected]. You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at http://audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org. All messages are archived and can be searched and read at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]. If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the list, please send E-mail to [email protected].
