Dude, the fact that it's taken 6 months to make it here at all might
tell you something. Think about it. Nuff said.

On 4/22/13, shaun everiss <[email protected]> wrote:
> yeah anything is better than nothing scot you are right on that point.
> its just that this small step in the right direction gets to another
> step  of the same.
> And to be frank I am actually getting bored with these steps.
> the fact that it took 6 months to get here and before that I never
> knew about it means in reality that it was never that big.
> We may be moving along vary  slowly but to what.
> Another article, another  servey, another descussion on what a good
> idea it will be.
> if you call that progress then thats fine.
> However I have been playing with games since 1993.
> and windows games for the last 10 years.
> I am due to upgrade to another box, this current one will be still
> used for games.
> I want some meat!!!
> I am tired of all these research studdies, and things, I want
> something to play.
> if I were a programmer who knows but I am not nore know where to start.
> I tried to review tutorials  for various languages and got totally
> over run with stuff.
> not sure what else to do, and doubt another article would help unless
> ofcause we could get it out of the net maybe to where it would make
> some difference if it would.
> so yeah we are making progress like we have been for ages and will
> continue to do so.
> As long as you view progress to achieve nothing more than progress
> through towards achieving an ever looping progress that is fine.
> I may be wrong and frankly I hope I am.
>
> At 09:02 AM 4/23/2013, you wrote:
>>As tempting as it is to reply to this point by point, I really don't
>>want to get into the rant thread that will no doubt ensue. All I'll
>>say is that it's a case in point for Cara's thoughts on approaching
>>the future armed to the teeth with positivity, and that something, how
>>ever small, is always gonna be better than nothing for someone,
>>somewhere.
>>
>>Wow. Just wow.
>>
>>
>>On 4/22/13, shaun everiss <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > hi scot.
>> > an interesting paper.
>> > Ofcause if we are being noticed by the big companies especially
>> > microsoft which is one of those that are huge there is hope.
>> > However there is a difference from putting out yet another studdy, to
>> > actually doing anything about it.
>> > What for example is basic accessability?
>> > basic could be defined that you can open, read the title, close the
>> > program, and quit it.
>> > it could also mean things like stereo sound for objects, maybe simple
>> > target beeps, etc.
>> > it doesn't  mean though that menus are accessable or anything.
>> > and while there is the ability even in graphical lanugages like unity
>> > xna, etc to use speech on a wider scale bar the sports games basic
>> > accessability is narator, ms magnifier,  ms accessability frontends
>> > in options on windows, text on screen, etc etc.
>> > its not really accessability, its just crap.
>> > I am not convinced that with the way ms did all its narators and its
>> > so called accessability that it will even remotely help us.
>> > unless we use windows xp for ever with pirated cracked keys and ms
>> > office xp with the same keys.
>> > all the new ribbons and then there is win9, just about everyone I
>> > talk to in the industry down to my screen reader dealer says that
>> > basically it will work but in reality win8 is crap and unstable and
>> > stupid right now and to stay with 7 or even better xp.
>> > with xp dieing 7 is probably the best we will get.
>> > so when ms talk about accessability I am not sure if I should beleve
>> > them or not.
>> > not to mention we just get this now on a list for the little blind
>> > people hidden away on some place on the net.
>> > the fact is if this was really big news it would have appeared
>> > offline on the news or in stores.
>> > I don't mean to be critical but with the track record on ms
>> > accessability and how they have mangled office and windows to make it
>> > harder for  us to use meaning we have to fiddle round is just not
>> > sitting with me at all.
>> > worse that paper is at least 6 months old.
>> > 6 months is enough time for at least some small games to have come out.
>> > no one cares about the poor blind.
>> > this paper means nothing, or maybe its too soon.
>> > My issue is that everyone is happy to concider things like this a
>> > good idea, serveys, papers, the lot.
>> > Vary few actually do anything.
>> > with the acception of a few small developers on the audiogames forum.
>> > no companies online or offline stores have even managed to get close.
>> > maybe if one of the big gaming companies like nentendo or soni did
>> > simular papers I'd actually hope this would work but no such luck.
>>
>>---
>>Gamers mailing list __ [email protected]
>>If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to
>> [email protected].
>>You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at
>>http://audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org.
>>All messages are archived and can be searched and read at
>>http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected].
>>If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the
>> list,
>>please send E-mail to [email protected].
>
>
>
> ---
> Gamers mailing list __ [email protected]
> If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to
> [email protected].
> You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at
> http://audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org.
> All messages are archived and can be searched and read at
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected].
> If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the list,
> please send E-mail to [email protected].
>

---
Gamers mailing list __ [email protected]
If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to [email protected].
You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at
http://audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org.
All messages are archived and can be searched and read at
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected].
If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the list,
please send E-mail to [email protected].

Reply via email to