Right, but the problem with voting on commercial versus free games is the user base is ten times that for a free game as it is for a commercial game, and it would not be a fair competition since so many people would be voting for the free games, not having played the commercial ones, so for me, this seems like a must have difference in categories. Regarding the sports category, I think these could be lumped into action. Like wise, a card game could go into strategy, we just have to broaden the definition of the categories a bit to keep the number down it seems to me. Also, like Thomas and Raul I have lots of stuff going on outside of this voting deal, so I would rather keep the categories to a manageable number, less than ten total categories would be ideal. Later, Che
----- Original Message ----- From: "Dark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Gamers Discussion list" <gamers@audyssey.org> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 5:12 PM Subject: Re: [Audyssey] Award catagories was: voting on game of the year > Hi Che. > > the problem I believe with doing it by genre as Tom said, is that so few > games of given genres have been produced, it'd be a forgone conclusion. > for > example, I think the only sports game produced this year has been the > update > to Jim's win baseball. > > I do agree catagories like action and stratogy might be useful, but > personally I'd rather use those than commercial vs free, sinse there have > been some free games like Sound Rts and topspeed 2 which are amazingly > extensive and deep, and one or two commercial games, which I personally > have --- Gamers mailing list __ Gamers@audyssey.org If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at http://audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org. All messages are archived and can be searched and read at http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the list, please send E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
