I'd probably choose the e. maily because only 3 actual movies have come out with it, a few more books with it, and a couple sighted games. I was hoping for actual storylines where you do explore planets and such achieving sertain objectives as well as battle. Obviously I don't expect something like elete force ii although that would be nice. I also don't expect a game with combat, exploration, etc and solving problems as well as puzzles which would again be nice but really I have no idea what goes into these things, and its probably to much to ask at this point. I'd at some point in the future like a ds9 style game or something where you wer odo or sisco or someone on the station doing things, not sure what. At 06:45 p.m. 16/04/2008, you wrote: >Hi everyone, >Over the passed couple of months I have been tinkering with STFC 2.0 off >and on. Unlike STFC 1.x STFC 2.0 is going to be a real time action game. >Instead of commanding several bases, ships, etc you will be in charge of >commanding a single ship throughout the various missions. However, that >is about as far as I have got with the basic idea for the game. One >question remains which ship to use. >I personally want to stick with something Next Generation era and that >pretty much narrows it down to Enterprise NCC-1701-D or Enterprise >NCC-1701-E. Though, thje U.S.S. Defiant is also an option here. Each >ship is good, but all depends on if you want a television series type >plot or a movie plot. Each ship is unique. >Enterprise NCC-1701-D, as seen on Star Trek Next Generation, is a >Galaxy-Class cruiser. Armorment includes 250 photon torpedoes, 9 deep >space probes, standard type-x phasers, and shields were rated at 2026 >gigawatts. Maximum achieved speed on STNG was warp 9.6 for 12 minutes. >Not bad, but after the movies came out the Enterprise E has really made >the television series sound sort of lame. >Enterprise NCC-1701-E, as seen in Star Trek 8, 9, and 10 has far more >fire power than its earlier name sake. The latest Enterprise comes armed >with 325 photon torpedoes, 175 quantum torpedoes, type-x phasers, >ablative hull armor, and shield strength is 5056 >gigawatts. Maximum rated speed is warp 9.7. As you can see the newer >Enterprise has far more armor, firepower, speed, etc. >The U.S.S. Defiant, seen on Star Trek Deep Space 9, certainly has its >own interesting abilities and features. It comes armed with a cloaking >device, 60 quantom torpedoes, 30 photon torpedoes, type-u phaser cannon, >ablative hull armor, and shields are rated as 2026 gigawatts. Maximum >known speed is warp 9.985. Definitly not bad ship specs if you ask me. >I guess what I am asking if you had to pick one which ship would you >choose. If you choose Defiant chances are I would make most of the >missions take place during the dominion war so you can slug it out with >Jem'hadar fighters, Breen Battle Cruisers, and Cardassian Cruisers. If >you pick Enterprise D I would make the missions play out more-or-less >like the tv series with each mission have its own bad guys, mission >orders, etc. With the Enterprise E we could go either way. The >Enterprise E was constructed just before the Dominion War, served >through the Dominion War, and seen action after the Dominion War. > >Cheers. > > >--- >Gamers mailing list __ [email protected] >If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at >http://audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org. >All messages are archived and can be searched and read at >http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] >If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the list, >please send E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Gamers mailing list __ [email protected] If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at http://audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org. All messages are archived and can be searched and read at http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the list, please send E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
