I think I introduced that and I think both TEXT or OTHER would work, I just was not sure enough about the format/type since I had not seen an example with IPv6.
Cheers, Helga On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Dimitris Aragiorgis <[email protected]>wrote: > * Iustin Pop <[email protected]> [2013-03-11 10:16:38 +0100]: > > > Hi all, > > > > The network fields in queries are declared as follows: > > > > - name: QFT_TEXT > > - network: QFT_TEXT > > - gateway: QFT_OTHER > > - network6: QFT_OTHER > > - gateway6: QFT_OTHER > > - mac_prefix: QFT_OTHER > > > > I find this a bit inconsistent; both network, gateway, n6, g6 are IP > > addresses, so we should choose either QFT_TEXT or QFT_OTHER for all of > > them, but not mixed. > > > > MAC prefix is, well, a mac prefix, so it should have the same type as > > above. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > Hi, > > I think they are defined QFT_OTHER because they can be None. name and > network are mandatory at the moment. If I switch network to QFT_OTHER > I think this raises an error. Am I stand correctly? > > Thanks, > dimara > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) > > iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJRPaQyAAoJEMk10sCdtK5j5vIH/0K6NnCLW25bdKuSomGZ/S9B > oIfOaKwtOmT+0WNffAfUgFZ4ZMYkJQfpy1bP1+ddY3nNv6CYOw+On3Px8e5eRf+b > XQYgC16ftMpc5V3kUjc91pNMKR0fqLJnxTaedZu4f+mgaKhuUz/OaU5SDL+Isn1M > t79fwt+ia9+zBhZjQRN0XFYmMqfwET8syFPihnBaWCfAF3O5BNE0bDtxy2Khyxgj > 6AZghqoDwCvLLo0aSnQNIyh213S04D1aiK93xuyDCCPhfIzsftFxfFX2xBU0AiqO > AD7Z7+XadH1PEGSuWa5BPKF+Ikiv3xocLC2oCCcQcVO0uDsMRD5OrFmdYZwJnn4= > =A4dW > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >
