--- Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 12:38:00AM -0800, Martin Knoblauch wrote: > > > > I see no problem to add OpenBSD support in 3.0.5. Just go on and > check > > it in once you are satisfied with your stuff. > > checked it in already in revision 697. >
saw it. > > > Just out of curiosity: how similar are the BSD flavours? We > already > > have NetBSD and FreeBSD support in. > > I used NetBSD as a base from my port (as it is the closest), sadly > they are not that similar as to just work with the other source > as you can see by the diff. > Understand. Btw. you should check the use of the strings NetBSD / FreeBSD in you patch :-) > DragonflyBSD will be most likely closer to FreeBSD and the same for > MacOS X (AKA Darwin), but I have no interest on adding those yet > (DragonFlyBSD could be an interesting option for clusters, but > I'd heard of no one using it in a cluster yet). > You realize that we already have a Darwin port, although I do not know the quality/completeness of the metrics code. Cheers Martin ------------------------------------------------------ Martin Knoblauch email: k n o b i AT knobisoft DOT de www: http://www.knobisoft.de
