On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Bernard Li wrote:
> Hi Matthias: > > On 10/17/07, Matthias Blankenhaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I wished we could have more elaborate Linux 2.6 memory metrics like > > mapped, dirty, slab. > > > > Also, it would be nice to have memory metrics organzied as a stack like > > this: > > > > slab > > buffers > > dirty > > writeback > > cache_clean (= cached - (dirty+writeback)) > > mapped > > free > > With the new python module support, isn't it pretty straight forward > to write your own Python gmetric? Or am I missing something here? Yes, this is straight forward. However, I was thinking that core 2.6 metrics should be in the standard set of metrics, no ? Thanx, Matthias > > Cheers, > > Bernard > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Ganglia-developers mailing list Ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers
