I reverted the patch that I had originally in trunk and have committed 
Martin's patch to both trunk and the monitor-core-3.0 branch.  There has been 
some testing done already, but it would probably be good to test a bit more.

Brad

>>> On 2/14/2008 at 11:50 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Bernard Li"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi guys:
> 
> On 2/14/08, Brad Nicholes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>>     It doesn't really matter to me which patch we use.  The most important 
> thing is consistency.  If you feel like your patch is more complete, I would 
> suggest that you drop it into trunk first and then backport it into the 3.0.x 
> branch.  We probably need to look at the other platforms as well and cross 
> port the patch if required.  I think your other suggestion about migrating 
> duplicate code into common functions is a good one as well.
> 
> I would like to release 3.0.7 soonish, so if you guys could decide
> which patch to use and check them into the branch and trunk, I'd
> appreciate it.
> 
> I'll roll a snapshot and have folks test before doing the release.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bernard
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ 
> _______________________________________________
> Ganglia-developers mailing list
> Ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net 
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers 




-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Ganglia-developers mailing list
Ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers

Reply via email to