On Feb 15, 2008 5:42 PM, Bernard Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sure, please update us after the weekend, we'll likely release 3.0.7 then.

Running valgrind on the ganglia-3.0.6.200802141157.tar.gz tarball you
posted for testing:

==2590== 5,554 bytes in 1,282 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 13 of 16
==2590==    at 0x4904A06: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:149)
==2590==    by 0x3DCEC707E1: strndup (in /lib64/tls/libc-2.3.4.so)
==2590==    by 0x407F74: bytes_out_func (in /usr/sbin/gmond)
==2590==    by 0x404A54: Ganglia_collection_group_collect (in /usr/sbin/gmond)
==2590==    by 0x404CB0: process_collection_groups (in /usr/sbin/gmond)
==2590==    by 0x405190: main (in /usr/sbin/gmond)
==2590==
==2590== LEAK SUMMARY:
==2590==    definitely lost: 5,554 bytes in 1,282 blocks.
==2590==      possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks.
==2590==    still reachable: 415,977 bytes in 998 blocks.
==2590==         suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks.


I modified my gmond.conf to report much more aggressively than usual
so that the test time would be shorter.  However, with *this
configuration*, it works out to about 770 bytes per minute.



-- 
Jesse Becker
GPG Fingerprint -- BD00 7AA4 4483 AFCC 82D0  2720 0083 0931 9A2B 06A2

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Ganglia-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers

Reply via email to