Hi Ian: On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Ian Chesal <ian.che...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is this preferable to using the HEAD of the trunk in Subversion? That's what > I've been working with thus far. Is the SVN repo not usually stable? That is essentially from HEAD. I've just cut the code from trunk as a "tech preview" because it's not from either the release nor maintenance branches. Trunk is in generally stable, but there are times when things are broken but we try to fix them up ASAP. The current goal is to get the last of 3.0.x maintenance release out (3.0.8), then the 3.1 branch becomes the maintenance branch and we can create a 3.2 release branch. We will then work on stabilizing and testing the code in that tree and eventually release that as 3.2.0. > Is there a set of metrics your most interested in? I can certainly do a > general performance comparison, but if there's something ganglia-specific > people want to know I'm all ears. To me, I would be most interested in CPU and memory usage comparison between gmetad-C and gmetad-python. Also scalability stats and integration with rrdcached would also be interesting. Others might have something else to add to the list. Cheers, Bernard ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb _______________________________________________ Ganglia-developers mailing list Ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers
