Here's a segment gmond output. In more recent versions of gmond the '-d 
99' 
option is not supported. To generate this output I had to change the 
defaults in the gmond.conf file.

listening thread(s) have been started
listening thread(s) have been started
cleanup thread has been started
multicasting on channel 239.2.11.71 8649
gmond: /dev/ksyms is not a 32-bit kernel namelist
kvm_open: No such file or directory
 *** WARNING!!!!  kvm_open() failed.  prepare for a segfault ... ***
*** kvm_open() failed, are you running gmond as root?
kvm_nlist: Bad address
Lookup up kstat:  km (unix?)='unix', ks (system_misc?)='system_misc',kn 
(resulti
ng metric?)='ncpus'
ncpus: kc is 38718
ncpus: Just did kstat_lookup().
ncpus: Looked up.
ncpus: Kstat data type:  2, Value returned: 20, 20 20 20
ncpus: Kernel close.  Val returned: 20
metric_init: Assigning cpu_num value (20) to ncpus.
Segmentation Fault

Yes I am running as root. Why is it complaining about /dev/ksyms not being 
32-bit? Am I missing a configure option?

Thanks Again,

On Wed, 7 May 2003, steven wagner wrote:

> Ken MacInnis wrote:
> 
> >On Wed, 7 May 2003, David Bickle wrote:
> >
> >  
> >
> >>Still having problems I've compiled gcc 3.2.2 from source with the
> >>CPU=sparc64. I'm running Solaris 8. I have also compiled ganglia with
> >>--enable-sparc64. gmond
> >>still won't launch for some reason. Check this:
> >>
> >>bash-2.03$ file /usr/local/sbin/gmond
> >>/usr/local/sbin/gmond:  ELF 64-bit MSB executable SPARCV9 Version 1,
> >>dynamically linked, not stripped
> >>
> >>Any suggestions?
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >What does 'gmond -d 99' say?  Is it coredumping or quitting?
> >
> >  
> >
> Also, make sure you're running it as root.
> 
> But yeah, without the debug output we're all just randomly picking from 
> the Grab Bag o' Fixes, which makes our advice only slightly more likely 
> to help you than any random thing a first-tier dialup tech support rep 
> could offer...
> 

-- 
--
David Bickle
Software/System Engineer
HPCVL Carleton University
613-520-2600 x8758
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.hpcvl.org


Reply via email to