On Tue, 2004-11-02 at 22:51, Bernard Li wrote: > Hi Scott: > > 8651 is the default XML port, don't use it for the Multicast port!
it shouldn't be a problem because XML is transported via TCP and multicast is UDP. there are no conflict between 8651/tcp and 8651/udp. -matt > > Cheers, > > Bernard > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Foster, Scott (MS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 14:31 > > To: Marcel Birthelmer > > Cc: Bernard Li; Sean Dilda; [email protected] > > Subject: RE: [Ganglia-general] Multiple clusters single gmetad > > > > Thanks for the help. I found the lock file in > > /var/lock/subsys and deleted the gmond file. However I still > > get the problem whenever I try to start gmond after gmetad is > > started. I reversed the order and get the same error message > > except now gmetad says it is dead. > > > > Here is a quick summary of my setup: > > > > Production Nodes - Multicast 8650 > > Remote Nodes - Multicast 8651 > > Experimental Nodes - Multicast 8652 > > Servers - Multicast 8649 > > > > gmetad, apache, rrd, and gmond are setup to run on one > > server. gmetad starts ok, gmond gives me "gmond dead, subsys > > locked", rrd and apache work fine. > > > > My server is setup in its gmond.conf file to be part of the > > "Servers" cluster. Utilizing mulicast port 8649 and I have > > all trusted set to on. > > > > If I've left something out I apologize. I'm happy to post > > more info if needed. > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > Scott > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Marcel Birthelmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 2:14 PM > > To: Foster, Scott (MS) > > Cc: Bernard Li; Sean Dilda; [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [Ganglia-general] Multiple clusters single gmetad > > > > > > Probably a stale lockfile somewhere in /var/lock/subsys . Try > > '/etc/init.d/gmond zap' and then restart it. > > - Marcel > > > > Foster, Scott (MS) wrote: > > > Thank you all for your help. It is working now, but of > > course I'm trying to make one more tweak to get it exactly as > > we want it. So I'm not sure if the following can be done. > > > > > > I am trying to get the headnode and other servers to show > > up in the server group, but since the headnode is running > > gmetad when I try to launch gmond I get a error message: > > gmond dead subsys locked. > > > > > > I'm not sure what that means. Basically the server group > > doesn't show up in ganglia like all the other groups. > > > > > > Scott > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > > > Bernard Li > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 11:28 AM > > > To: Foster, Scott (MS); Sean Dilda > > > Cc: [email protected] > > > Subject: RE: [Ganglia-general] Multiple clusters single gmetad > > > > > > > > > Hi: > > > > > > You would only need to list them ALL for redundancy - if > > you only list > > > one node in the data_source, then if that node dies for whatever > > > reason then gmetad will not be able to collect data from that > > > subcluster. So I guess having at least 2 nodes is good for > > a large subcluster. > > > > > > I don't think anybody in their right mind would list all > > 1000 nodes in > > > data_source ;-) > > > > > > Good luck. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Bernard > > > > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > > >>From: Foster, Scott (MS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 10:49 > > >>To: Bernard Li; Sean Dilda > > >>Cc: [email protected] > > >>Subject: RE: [Ganglia-general] Multiple clusters single gmetad > > >> > > >>Ah that makes sense. > > >> > > >>But if I'm running gmond on each node in the subcluster do > > I need to > > >>specify each of them as datasources? I'm not sure that makes sense > > >>especially if I have 1000 nodes each running gmond. I know I'm > > >>missing something here and I appreciate all your continued help. > > >> > > >>Scott > > >> > > >>-----Original Message----- > > >>From: Bernard Li [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 10:09 AM > > >>To: Foster, Scott (MS); Sean Dilda > > >>Cc: [email protected] > > >>Subject: RE: [Ganglia-general] Multiple clusters single gmetad > > >> > > >> > > >>Hi Scott: > > >> > > >>The different ip addresses showing in gmetad.conf is not the ip > > >>address of the server running gmetad but instead one of the > > node (the > > >>headnode of that subgroup, if you may), which runs gmond. > > >> > > >>Check the syntax of the data_source tag, the ip/hostname > > listed there > > >>refers to one or all the nodes in that subgroup/datasource. > > >> > > >>Cheers, > > >> > > >>Bernard > > >> > > >> > > >>>-----Original Message----- > > >>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > >>>Foster, Scott (MS) > > >>>Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 9:14 > > >>>To: Sean Dilda > > >>>Cc: [email protected] > > >>>Subject: RE: [Ganglia-general] Multiple clusters single gmetad > > >>> > > >>>How does that work with the gmetad having 3 different IP > > >> > > >>addresses? > > >> > > >>>My goal was to have one server running gmetad, rrd, and > > >> > > >>apache. Do I > > >> > > >>>have to have gmetad running on another system to break my > > >> > > >>cluster into > > >> > > >>>sub-clusters? > > >>> > > >>>Thanks for the earlier reply. I appreciate it. > > >>> > > >>>Scott > > >>> > > >>>-----Original Message----- > > >>>From: Sean Dilda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>>Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 5:14 PM > > >>>To: Foster, Scott (MS) > > >>>Cc: [email protected] > > >>>Subject: Re: [Ganglia-general] Multiple clusters single gmetad > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>On Mon, 2004-11-01 at 17:47, Foster, Scott (MS) wrote: > > >>> > > >>>>I've successfully setup ganglia (thanks to everyone on this > > >>> > > >>>list), but now I want to try and break out our cluster > > into smaller > > >>>sub clusters. > > >>> > > >>>>1) Production Nodes > > >>>>2) Remote Nodes > > >>>>3) Test Nodes > > >>>> > > >>>>I'm trying to do all this with one server running gmetad > > >>> > > >>>for all the nodes in the cluster regardless of their > > >> > > >>different status. > > >> > > >>>Is this even possible? > > >>> > > >>>>I've been playing with different multicast addresses and > > >>> > > >>>xml addresses and haven't had much success. Has anyone ever tried > > >>>this before? > > >>> > > >>>Yes, this is possible, I'm currently running ganglia like this. I > > >>>have a different gmond.conf for each subcluster. > > >>>The only thing that changes between the gmond.conf's is the > > >> > > >>"name" and > > >> > > >>>"mcast_channel", all other settings are the same. > > >>>As for the gmetad.conf, here's the crucial part of it: > > >>> > > >>>data_source "Head Cluster" 300 10.10.1.19 data_source "Storage" 300 > > >>>10.10.1.1 data_source "Monitor" 300 localhost > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: > Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE > LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idU88&alloc_id065&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Ganglia-general mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-general -- PGP fingerprint 'A7C2 3C2F 8445 AD3C 135E F40B 242A 5984 ACBC 91D3' They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. --Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
