Add a rule to accept the multicast traffic on the listening server with
the port multicasting too. Some firewalls block listening multicast
traffic.


-d 239.2.11.71 -dport 8649



On Wed, 2005-09-21 at 12:24, Peter Huskey wrote:
> Hi
> 
> I have installed gmetad/gmond on my network primarily using the
> defaults described in the README, including using the mcast
> 239.2.11.71/8649 setting. I currently use guarddog to configure my
> iptables; within the program I opened ports 8649,8651 and 8652.  With
> the firewall activated I can telnet to these ports from localhost and
> other nodes and none appear closes (8649 prints the metric info, 8651
> prints the XML page).  Nmap on these ports confirm that I am not
> imagining anything.  However, if I run ‘gstat –a’ or look at the XML
> output, the nodes, even the one running gmetad appear to be down.  If
> I shutdown iptables (service iptables stop), then after a few seconds
> qstat and the webpage show everything working correctly.  I ran
> tcpdump for both cases (sans_firewall: firewall off, avec_firewall:
> firewall on) and I don’t see anything overly  different between the
> packets received at :8649 except for the id number [10.1.1.2 is my
> server running both gmetad and gmond]:
> 
>  
> 
> avec_firewall:09:59:40.978538 10.1.1.2.2334 > 239.2.11.71.8649: [udp
> sum ok] udp 8 (DF) [ttl 1] (id 65249, len 36)
> 
> avec_firewall:09:59:53.229866 10.1.1.2.2334 > 239.2.11.71.8649: [udp
> sum ok] udp 8 (DF) [ttl 1] (id 65250, len 36)
> 
> avec_firewall:10:00:13.242172 10.1.1.2.2334 > 239.2.11.71.8649: [udp
> sum ok] udp 8 (DF) [ttl 1] (id 65251, len 36)
> 
> sans_firewall:10:45:14.842308 10.1.1.2.2334 > 239.2.11.71.8649: [udp
> sum ok] udp 8 (DF) [ttl 1] (id 502, len 36)
> 
> sans_firewall:10:45:34.854596 10.1.1.2.2334 > 239.2.11.71.8649: [udp
> sum ok] udp 8 (DF) [ttl 1] (id 503, len 36)
> 
>  
> 
> Are there any other ports to which I should be paying attention or
> something else which would explain the strange behavior?  I can
> provide add’l config info if needed.
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> pete
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to