Steven,

if the problem is routing or actual packet loss, then that should be
reflected by the XML output of the master gmond - the "down" host will
have a TN (much) greater than the TMAX. e.g.:

<HOST NAME="ldndsm030000185.intranet.barcapint.com" IP="10.68.90.10"
REPORTED="1143022788" TN="145" TMAX="20" DMAX="0" LOCATION="unspecified"
GMOND_STARTED="1142870107">

There is also a very small chance that what you are seeing is related to
the "Possible bug in hosts up calculation" thread. This bug causes an
erroneous tagging of a data source as "old", which then changes the host
up calculation to be one based on the wall clock of the gmetad server.
Unless all the clocks are right, the host_up calculation is wrong.


You may try this patch:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=15170774

hope springs eternal, anyway. Myself, I only encountered the problem
fixed here when I was federating clusters.

There is also a host_up calculation in the PHP web stuff, ganglia.php,
function host_alive. You could put debugging in there as well. 

kind regards,
Richard

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven
A. DuChene
Sent: 21 March 2006 23:32
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Ganglia-general] gmond stops recognizing the rest of the
cluster


I have a couple of mixed clusters here with AMD64/Opteron compute nodes
and Intel EM64T Xeon managment nodes and I am running
ganglia-gmond-3.0.2

Periodically (sometimes a couple or more times a day) I check the stats
for the clusters and the cluster running RedHatEL-4.0 has a problem with
the master gmond process (the one running on the management server with
interfaces on the internal cluster network and the external lan here).
It still responds to a query (using the python ganglia client or through
the standard front end web
page) but it stops seeing the client nodes and marks them off-line. It
will indicate that only one host (itself) is actually up. I have to
constantly be watching the outputs to see if this has happened and when
it does do a:

 /etc/init.d/gmond restart

That clears it up until next time.

Any idea what could be causing this? I have been using ganglia to
monitor clusters for quite some time but this is the first time i have
seen the gmond process needing to be restarted to regain connection to
the data stream running around inside the cluster.

BTW, I have added a line to the /etc/init.d/gmond script to add a host
route on the system with the dual network interfaces to point
239.2.11.71 to the network interface that faces to the internal network
of the cluster.

I do not seem to have this issue with the cluster that has RedHatEL3
installed (same hardware thought). It is a smaller cluster (64 nodes
verses the 128 cluster) though.
--
Steven A. DuChene




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting
language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the
live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new
coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Ganglia-general mailing list [email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-general


------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information about Barclays Capital, please
visit our web site at http://www.barcap.com.


Internet communications are not secure and therefore the Barclays 
Group does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this 
message.  Although the Barclays Group operates anti-virus programmes, 
it does not accept responsibility for any damage whatsoever that is 
caused by viruses being passed.  Any views or opinions presented are 
solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the 
Barclays Group.  Replies to this email may be monitored by the Barclays 
Group for operational or business reasons.

------------------------------------------------------------------------


Reply via email to