Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > | ------- Additional Comment #2 From Timothy Witham 2008-06-05 10:38
> > | My patch still loses if we are talking to a gmond affected by Bug#38.
> > | In that case, we receive incomplete data, but since it is some data,
> > | we keep talking to that host every time.  Maybe we should just talk to
> > | a random host every time.  Better to fix Bug#38 though...
> >
> > That would have the effect of gmetad
> > getting incomplete, old data from that gmond, but that seems to be a
> > different problem.
> 
> yes, and that is why it has a different bug.

What bug is that?

I'm not talking about fixing gmond, I'm talking about having gmetad
sense when gmond from one meber of the cluster is giving old &
incomplete data, and trying another cluster member to see if it can
get newer data.  I didn't see a bug for that, I just saw a note in the
"timeout poll" bug mentioned that a solution for it wouldn't handle
that situation, and saying that's okay, that *should* be separate.

Is there indeed a bug, or a plan by someone, to get gmetad to do this?

> > Told solve it in gmetad, we'd want gmetad to have
> > some way of judging whether the data it's getting from a gmond is
> > fresh and current, which is not the same as judging whether it
> > actually *got* the data from the gmond.

> the problematic code was introduced as a fix for BUG27 and was
> indeed trying to detect if gmond was able to use the source or not
> by looking at the obvious lack of TCP connectivity.  BUG92 showed
> that the heuristic was incomplete because didn't include gmond/system
> that are hung but still responsive to a TCP three way handshake

That was the *original* discussion on this thread, and that is indeed
what the "timeout poll" bug is trying to address.  What I'm saying is
in reference to Timothy Witham's last note, which is a rather different
matter.  So I'm confused by your response - not that anything you say
is confusing, I'm just confused by how it relates to what you
responded to?
  -- Cos

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Ganglia-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-general

Reply via email to