On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 18:42, jeff <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello all > > For various internal reasons within the company, we need to keep gmetad > at 3.0.x on our Ganglia "master'. We currently have rrdtool 1.2.x, but I > see that 1.4.x is out. Are there any known issues with going from > rrdtool 1.2.x to 1.4.x with an older gmetad version? If 1.4.x doesn't > work, would 1.3.x be acceptable? I've heard that 1.3.x has better I/O > performance.
There should not be any problems with rrdtool 1.3. You may see some minor differences in fonts moving from 1.2 to 1.3 or 1.4, but this should be a cosmetic change, as opposed to functional. IIRC, 1.3.x added various madvise() improvements to avoid needless readahead calls. I suspect these are included in 1.4.x as well. Or are you refering to something else? -- Jesse Becker ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Ganglia-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-general
