drewc wrote: [snip] > That is somewhat true, although i have an xmls 2.0 in the works, > i have not had much time to devote to it.
[snip] > I've got a host of patches for xmls lying around, and a few > extensions. [snip] Any XPath capabilities? We've tried most of the packages, and c-xml is the one we chose to use. However, a lack of XPath capabilities led us down the road of wrapping libxml2 in CFFI. I'm not too far down the road, and would abandon it if adding XPath support to one of the existing packages is imminent. The thing with libxml2 is its blazing speed, which is attractive. However, I'm bogged down with memory faults in the current wrapping effort. Anyone out there have XPath patches? Should I keep wrapping? BA _______________________________________________ Gardeners mailing list [email protected] http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners
