I'll take a crack at the comparison doc. Sounds like an useful reference to have around when choosing your tools.
-Peter Peter Seibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Jan 15, 2006, at 11:08 PM, Tim Cross wrote: > >> I thought I'd point out an alternative package which may already >> support other language encodings - the package is called s-xml (in >> Debian it is cl-s-xml). > > So, while Keith may have decided that cxml is the XML parser that > best suits his needs, it would still be a *great* Gardening project > for someone to write up a web page on the ALU Wiki explaining the > differences between the different XML libraries. It may be that they > all have different strengths and weaknesses and its good that there > are several different ones in which case the right gardening thing to > do is to provide the information people need to decide which one is > right for their needs. Or it may be that there's one that's far > enough ahead of the others that the garden would be improved by doing > a bit of work to help it achieve total world domination. But the > first step is for someone to write that comparison. Anyone? > > -Peter > > -- > Peter Seibel * [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gigamonkeys Consulting * http://www.gigamonkeys.com/ > Practical Common Lisp * http://www.gigamonkeys.com/book/ -- B 01110011 01100001 01101001 01101110 01110100 ---------------------------------------------- Managing Member @ CORENOVA,LLC. M:562-405-5470 - let them be, just evolve. O:562-405-5470 ---------------------------------------------- 56 69 73 69 74 75 73 61 74: www.corenova.com CORENOVA> ./freedom. intoxicating. <RET> _______________________________________________ Gardeners mailing list [email protected] http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners
