On 2/24/06, Nikodemus Siivola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (2) I agree with the basic issue. I think a reasonable approach in case > of clnet would be to make a fair effort to reach the original owner, > and give him ample time (say a year) to respond. If he doesn't > respond tar up the project as owned by him, and move the ownership > to the intrepid taker-ower. If he is ever back and upset, explain > the situation hand over the original tarball and offer to reinstate > it as the project in question moving the interim stuff elsewhere.
Yes. Please CC [EMAIL PROTECTED] as you are mailing the owner to document that you have tried to reach him over a period of time. I think a year is stretching it but I'd like to see at least a month without any communication before we regard him as having no interest in the project's future. Comments welcome. Erik. _______________________________________________ Gardeners mailing list [email protected] http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners
