"Erik Enge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> that you have tried to reach him over a period of time. I think a
> year is stretching it but I'd like to see at least a month without any
> communication before we regard him as having no interest in the
> project's future.
I year may be excessive, but month is definitely on the short side.
While it might be interesting to run a site that aggressively reassigned
projects to more active people it's what we have right now.
Compromise at three months?
Month can easily happen if the person is filtering project/lisp mail
to a separate account or folder and is taking a hiatus, is on an
extended vacation, or whatever.
...then again, if the policy is to give back the ownership to the
original person, I don't see any great harm in being more impatient
and leaving it at one month.
Cheers,
-- Nikodemus Schemer: "Buddha is small, clean, and serious."
Lispnik: "Buddha is big, has hairy armpits, and laughs."
_______________________________________________
Gardeners mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners
