I'm convinced. It also eliminates any future licensing and use issues. How about a good methodology for attribution and copyright notices? The MIT license requires attachment of the license statement to derivative works, so if someone borrows a function what do they do? Do we have a different copyright and license paragraph for each copyright holder? I haven't had to worry about this before so I'm not sure what issues arise.
Ian Chris Dean wrote: >> Any concerns or preference on a license? (MIT vs. LLGPL?) >> > > My preferences is an MIT or BSD style license - it just seems more > straight forward for Lisp code. > > Cheers, > Chris Dean > _______________________________________________ Gardeners mailing list [email protected] http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners
