Dear Guenther,
Never used to patch. I say ditch it and if someone has issues install
the 2.6 kernel headers.
Cheers,
Stef
On 2/22/07, guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 19:36 +0100, guenther wrote:
>
> > IMHO, distro specific patches should go in only, if there is almost no
> > way for the user to fix the distro oops. In this case however, if I
> > understand you correctly, the "issue" simply is a matter of installing
> > the correct kernel headers -- which makes this nothing more than a
> > dependency outside of the GARNOME scope, that needs to be satisfied
> > (read installed) as provided by the distro.
> >
> > If this is correct, I am going to remove the (broken) patch. Peter, Stef
> > and Ed confirmed it isn't necessary anyway. Thanks, dudes! :)
>
> Any takers? What's the opinion of the Slackware using crowd? :)
>
> guenther
>
>
> --
> char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
> main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
> (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
>
> --
> garnome-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/garnome-list
>
--
garnome-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/garnome-list
