Herbert Voss wrote: > > Angus Leeming wrote: > > > On Thursday 04 April 2002 1:24 pm, Herbert Voss wrote: > >
> >> if (!isValidLength(a) || !isValidLength(b) || > >> !isValidLength(c) || !isValidLength(d)) > > this looks better to me > > if !(isValidLength(a) && isValidLength(b) && > isValidLength(c) && isValidLength(d)) > looks better, but couldn't the other version bail out on the first true !isValidLength, and the second require evaluating all? Garst
