Dear Kevin and all...

For various theoretical and experimentally tested reasons, I have come to 
believe that biomass is unstable relative to the products of "autopyrolysis". 
Bone dry wood in a closed container, once initiated, will Autopyrolyse to some 
CO2 and H2O and a number of other vapor species.  A too simple equation could be

C H1.4 O 0.6 (woody biomass) ==> 0.4C(charcoal) + 0.6 CO2 + 0.7H2.  Delta Hr = 
127 kJ/mole 
483.                                                  160.                      
              196.     KJ/mole 
And is exothermic.  This would be a (4.8/23) yield of charcoal 

Coal is approximately "CH". The similar equation is

CH (coal) ===> C (coke) + 1/2 H2.     Delta Hr = 0 (+\_ 15%, the accuracy of 
the bomb calorimeter)
540.                   400.          140
--------

So the "underground coal fire " is really a continuation of the coal making 
process, and not a fire at all, since there is no way to get oxygen underground.

MORE TO FOLLOW!

Tom Reed

Dr Thomas B Reed
President, The Biomass Energy Foundation
www.Woodgas.com

On Feb 15, 2011, at 6:49 AM, "Kevin" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Dear GF
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: GF
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2011 2:44 AM
> Subject: Re: [Gasification] 300 Megawatt Power Plant
> 
> kevin.
> I understand there are mines that have caught fire underground by accident in 
> the 1950's and are still burning with  the oxygen being produced by FT 
> reactions at the seat of the fire.
> GF
>  
> # Very true!! It is easy to set a mine fire, under the right conditions. 
> There is no question that FT reactions work, and there is no question that 
> such accidental underground coalfield fires have occurred in coalfields that 
> have been mined. From what I can see, (and please correct me if I am wrong):
>  
> 1: Such accidental underground coalfield fires are uncontrollable.
> 2: Such accidental underground coalfield fires can cause very significant 
> "surface damage", in terms of subsidence, or gas emanations that can make 
> nearby communities uninhabitable
> 3: Such accidental underground coalfield fires do not produce a consistent 
> gas, of value either for combustion in a process, or for utiligation in a 
> process.
> 4: Such accidental underground coalfield fires are generally considered to be 
> a disaster in the area where they occur.
> 5: Such accidental underground coalfield fires have never been used to 
> economic advantage
> 6: Such accidental underground coalfield fires are totally uncomparable to 
> "underground gasification projects intended to produce a fuel gas or 
> synthesis gas for economic benefit."
> 7: The Swan Hills Website contains a number of misleading statements that 
> seem to infer that their proposed project is equivalent to "gasification", 
> and that the relatively long history of "gasification" can be used to show 
> there project is technically feasible. For example, at 
> http://swanhills-synfuels.com/iscg/overview/ we see:
> Gasification History: Gasification was first developed in the 1800s and has 
> been used commercially throughout the world for more than 100 years. A 
> variety of industries have utilized the technology including chemical 
> production, fertilizer manufacturing, and electrical power generation. Today, 
> the majority of the operating gasification plants worldwide are surface 
> gasification plants designed to produce chemicals, fuels, electricity, and 
> fertilizers.
>  
> It then goes on to equate "Gasification" with "In-Situ Coal Gasification " 
> (ISCG)) in a misleading manner:
> "How does Gasification work? Feedstock (for ISCG it is deep coal) is exposed 
> to high temperature and high pressure. In the presence of steam at these 
> conditions a series of chemical reactions occur which convert the feedstock 
> into syngas."
> This would tend to suggest that the gas product from ISGC is equivalent to 
> the quality and production from a "surface gasification plant." The 
> Websiteite seems to gloss over the important differences, and seems to 
> overlook technical challenges that lie ahead for them. The Website contains a 
> number of statements which could be termed "forward looking."
>  
> Best wishes,
>  
> Kevin Chisholm
>  
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin <[email protected]>
> To: Discussion of biomass pyrolysis and gasification 
> <[email protected]>
> Sent: Mon, Feb 14, 2011 10:42 pm
> Subject: Re: [Gasification] 300 Megawatt Power Plant
> 
> Dear GF
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: GF
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 5:47 PM
> Subject: Re: [Gasification] 300 Megawatt Power Plant
> 
> What happens to the chlorine component in the underground reaction.
> when using salt water. Chlorine is really unfriendly to metals including 
> stainless steel.
> what sort of conduit is to be used for conducting the hot  product to the 
> surface for refinement?
>  
> # Very gfood question!! The presence of chlorine in a starved oxygen 
> combustion environment is likely to generate an environmental disaster, with 
> the chlorinated hydrocarbons that that will almost certainly result.
>  
> # Underground gasification of coal is a really neat concept, but as far as I 
> know it doesn't work. See:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Underground_coal_gasification Many people in 
> many places have spent many dollars trying to get it to work. After many 
> tests, there does not appear to be a single commercially successful 
> Underground Coal Gasification project now, or in the past.
>  
> # See their Website at http://swanhills-synfuels.com/  On their FAQ page, 
> http://swanhills-synfuels.com/iscg/faq/, they state:
> "Gasification can compete effectively in high-cost energy environments." This 
> seems to say a lot.
>  
> Best wishes,
>  
> Kevin Chisholm
>  
> GF
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henri Naths <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Mon, Feb 14, 2011 1:54 pm
> Subject: [Gasification] 300 Megawatt Power Plant
> 
>  
> Dear list and all
> I believe there some techincal issues involved with this gasification 
> process.  All comments are appreciated.
> Thanks
> Henri
>  
>  
>  $1.5 Billion Swan Hills Synfuels Project
>  was announced by the Alberta Government.  This project will manufacture 
> clean synthetic gas from 
> deep coal deposits to fuel a new 300 Megawatt Power Plant to be built at 
> Whitecourt. This transformative project
>  is a whole new way to generate clean electricity, using Alberta's vast, deep 
> stranded coal reserves. 
> Whitecourt will have the Province's first clean power source !
> In July 2010 Town Council approved the next 20 acre Phase of the Hilltop 
> Industrial area.  Infrastructure work will commence immediately in order to 
> have lots available for early spring 2011 to support the growth form the 
> above project.  In addition Pembina Pipelines announced the final approval of 
> their NIPISI & MITSUE pipeline projects in the Judy Creek area.  They are 
> expected to provide 1,000 short term construction jobs.
>  
> In situ coal is converted into a gas by piping saline water and pure oxygen 
> down an injection well.
> The resulting combustion, plus the steam created by it, converts the coal 
> into gas that flows up a production well to a surface gas-separation plant.
> The project will drill about 20 pairs of injection and production wells.
> “The gas is taken to a plant where the CO2 is removed,” said Shaigec. 
> (managing director for Swanhills Synfuels )     
> “We then have finished syngas, that is dispatched to a pipeline and then to 
> the generator.”
> This low-carbon gas will be used to fuel a new 300 MW power plant to be built 
> near Whitecourt, Alberta.
> Gasification History
> 
> Gasification was first developed in the 1800s and has been used commercially 
> throughout the world for more than 100 years. A variety of industries have 
> utilized the technology including chemical production, fertilizer 
> manufacturing, and electrical power generation. Today, the majority of the 
> operating gasification plants worldwide are surface gasification plants 
> designed to produce chemicals, fuels, electricity, and fertilizers.
> Gasification Market
> 
> As of 2008, there were 420 gasifiers at 140 facilities in operation globally, 
> the majority of these being surface gasification plants (source – GTC). World 
> gasification capacity is projected to grow by more than 70% by 2015 with much 
> of the growth occurring in Asia (source – GTC). A number of factors 
> contribute to a growing interest in gasification, including volatile oil and 
> natural gas prices, more stringent environmental regulations, and a growing 
> consensus that CO2 management should be required in power generation and 
> energy production.
> How does Gasification work?
> 
> Feedstock (for ISCG it is deep coal) is exposed to high temperature and high 
> pressure. In the presence of steam at these conditions a series of chemical 
> reactions occur which convert the feedstock into syngas.
> In the case of ISCG, this chemical conversion of the deep coal happens in 
> place in its original seam. The resultant syngas created consists primarily 
> of hydrogen, methane, carbon dioxide, and carbon monoxide.
> To create this chemical conversion, two wells are drilled into the deep coal 
> seam. A horizontal injection well is used to introduce oxygen and water into 
> the seam; the oxygen supports a limited and controlled amount of combustion, 
> raising the temperature of the coal and boiling the water to generate steam.
> The naturally existing deep underground pressure, along with the elevated 
> coal temperature and the presence of steam, together form the right 
> conditions to gasify the coal. The vertical production well is used to 
> conduct the raw syngas to the surface. Char and ash, which are remnants of 
> the original coal, remain deep underground.
> Figure 1. ISCG Well Pair Schematic
> 
> The coal seam for ISCG development at the Swan Hills Synfuels site is 1400 m 
> beneath the surface, approximately 800 m below the Base of Groundwater 
> Protection (depth limit of fresh groundwater – below this depth, groundwater 
> is saline), eliminating potential for fresh groundwater contamination. Saline 
> water is used for injection into the coal seam through the horizontal well, 
> virtually eliminating the need for fresh water in the ISCG process.
> _______________________________________________
> Gasification mailing list
> 
> to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
> [email protected]
> 
> to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
> http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_lists.bioenergylists.org
> 
> for more Gasifiers,  News and Information see our web site:
> http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org/
> _______________________________________________
> Gasification mailing list
> 
> to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
> [email protected]
> 
> to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
> http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_lists.bioenergylists.org
> 
> for more Gasifiers,  News and Information see our web site:
> http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org/
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 10.0.1204 / Virus Database: 1435/3443 - Release Date: 02/14/11
> _______________________________________________
> Gasification mailing list
> 
> to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
> [email protected]
> 
> to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
> http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_lists.bioenergylists.org
> 
> for more Gasifiers,  News and Information see our web site:
> http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org/
> _______________________________________________
> Gasification mailing list
> 
> to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
> [email protected]
> 
> to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
> http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_lists.bioenergylists.org
> 
> for more Gasifiers,  News and Information see our web site:
> http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org/
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 10.0.1204 / Virus Database: 1435/3444 - Release Date: 02/14/11
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gasification mailing list
> 
> to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
> [email protected]
> 
> to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
> http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_lists.bioenergylists.org
> 
> for more Gasifiers,  News and Information see our web site:
> http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org/
_______________________________________________
Gasification mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
[email protected]

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more Gasifiers,  News and Information see our web site:
http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org/

Reply via email to