"ABSOLUTELY" correct Mark ;-)

Richard Bockwinkel
Cellular: 913.579.7688

Specializing in Steam Systems Optimization

ERB & Associates, Inc.
www.erbsteam.com

1.866.610.3477 RapidFAX 

On Feb 27, 2011, at 6:45 PM, Mark E Ludlow wrote:

> Hi Toby,
> There is no difference, really, between pressure and vacuum. If we just start 
> to think of anything that has no pressure at all as Zero Pressure; normal 
> Atmospheric Pressure as 14.69 PSIA (PSI absolute) and so forth, then we  
> won’t get into trouble. Pump sizing always considers the Absolute Pressure 
> (e.g. PSIA) at the inlet and outlet, not the Gauge pressure (e.g. PSIG). A 
> third concept is Differential Pressure (e.g. PSID). A pump increases the 
> pressure (measured across the Inlet and Discharge Ports) as a differential 
> pressure gain, more-or-less irrespective of the Absolute Pressure environment 
> that it operates in.
> There is really no such thing as “Vacuum” conveying. This only refers to the 
> fact the transport network operates at or below the ambient pressure and is 
> operated this way to help reduce fugitive losses of transported materials. A 
> vacuum cannot move anything; it is the force of pressurized gas behind the 
> transported material that provides the propulsive energy. In the case of a 
> conveying system connected to a positive-displacement “vacuum” blower, the 
> force is a maximum of 14.69 PSI, enough to “lift” a water column 33.9 feet, 
> hardly any stretch at all for a pump, though the work done will be the same 
> regardless of the method used.
> When someone says: “Gravity doesn’t exist; the world sucks!”, this is a very 
> special case of the above that awaits the practical manipulation of 
> anti-gravity.
> Best, Mark
>  
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Toby 
> Seiler
> Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2011 3:42 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Gasification] Benefits of boosting compression ratio with producer 
> gas
>  
> Sorry Tom, I didn't ask the question correctly (or I may be off in left 
> field).  This comes from some time spent in a place called Flow Dynamics 
> Laboratory where inlet design of blowers was being tested.  My application 
> was sawdust material moving.  Dan, the owner, explained how pressure was much 
> more effective than vacuum for moving mass.  He explained that drag in a 
> vacuum is hard to overcome, while pressure fills the space with molecules and 
> can push materials great distances. 
>  
> When talking engines, for example on my 74 Ford f600, I watch the vacuum gage 
> and see that it is around 18-22" of vacuum, warmed up 1200 rpm or so (driving 
> hydraulic pump).  So what goes to the cylinders is not atmospheric pressure, 
> it is around half, perhaps less. 
>  
> I'm trying to understand how engine efficiency is related to both air and gas 
> pressure and density.  If producer gas is operating with 18/1 in a normally 
> aspirated engine, due to high octane, how will the ratio be affected if one 
> has positive pressure at one or two pounds? 
>  
> Seemingly this would involve air flow across an orifice, similar to a 
> butterfly valve (throttle), but I am at a loss for a good start point. 
>  
> Given a large quantity of air and gas to make comparable power (not large 
> derated), the flow of air/gas in a large displacement engine would seem to be 
> a much more critical factor than just saying the cylinder is seeing 
> atmosphere pressure and forgetting the drag that manifolds, throttle valves 
> and pulling gas from a gasifier creates (in a suction system).  I can hardly 
> see a direct linear relationship. 
>  
> My work is a low pressure system, so this is not an academic or theoretical 
> discussion that I will never act on and I'm at a point of determining engine 
> for a CHP and what internal modifications to plan, if any.   I have several 
> engines, a 345 International, a 460 Ford, a Cumins 5.7 (with needed repair), 
> a 7.3 International (in a ford truck also needing repair). 
>  
> Sorry if this is confusing or not cogent.  I'm trying.
>  
> Toby
> seilertechco 
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Gasification mailing list
> 
> to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
> [email protected]
> 
> to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
> http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_lists.bioenergylists.org
> 
> for more Gasifiers,  News and Information see our web site:
> http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org/

_______________________________________________
Gasification mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
[email protected]

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more Gasifiers,  News and Information see our web site:
http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org/

Reply via email to