Dear GF and all

There would not be much absorbtion in the short (crosswise) path through the 
smoke, but possibly half going longitudinally.  

Tom Reed 

Thomas B Reed 
280 Hardwick Rd
Barre, Ma 01005
508-353-7841

> On Jan 3, 2014, at 1:05 AM, [email protected] wrote:
> 
>  
> Regarding the reflected heat from the refractory: If you were to travel on 
> the footplate of a steam locomotive at full regulator, you might observe a 
> temperature of 2,500 f in the fire box. in which there is generally  a 
> refractory (brick) arch above the grate which extends the flame pattern and 
> generally helps the secondary air entering above the grate to insure compete 
> combustion. I have observed these arches to glow bight Yellow, the surface of 
> the brickwork actually  melting with the heat. I am certain the radiation has 
> a  lot to do with complete combustion. Would this form of radiation help 
> refine "smoke" (gas) breaking it down into short chain Molecules?
>  
> GF
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> In a message dated 1/2/2014 3:35:33 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, 
> [email protected] writes:
> Paul,
> 
>  
> 
> I designed a diesel burner for preheating a bubbling fluidised combustor 
> about 12 years ago. Fortunately I took advice from an old and experienced 
> engineer who advised that we had to line the fire box with refractory. When 
> questioned why, his explanation was as follows: the diesel burns and gives 
> off radiant heat to the wall. The wall heats up and radiates heat back toward 
> the flame. The incoming radiation from the refractory is what evaporates and 
> heats the diesel so that it is able to burn nearly completely (as opposed to 
> the smoky start when the refractory is cold). I suspect that Rolf’s 
> refractory does much the same thing in that it sends radiation back into the 
> log. This heating effect is frequently underestimated as to its assistance 
> with the whole combustion process. We also use this effect in the first 
> portion of wall above the bubbling fluid bed level to provide radiation into 
> the secondary air combustion area. Above this we build a membrane wet wall 
> boiler. As with Rolf, our secondary air is aimed downward as we run the 
> bubbling bed under a slight vacuum.
> 
>  
> 
> I am looking forward to seeing Rolf’s photos.
> 
>  
> 
> Rex
> 
>  
> 
> From: Paul Anderson [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: 27 December 2013 04:49 PM
> To: Discussion of biomass pyrolysis and gasification; [email protected]
> Subject: [Gasification] Fwd: RE: Whole log pyrolysis for char production was 
> Re: Wood heating in the UK - whole log gasification
> 
>  
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> This excellent reply below came from Rolf.   Thank you!!
> 
> Pictures only after 6 January, but by then I am in Africa and might not 
> remember to request that Rolf send them.  Together, we should be able to get 
> this worked out.
> 
> We definitely should have some other people replicating this and suggesting 
> solutions for char removal, etc.    And there should be some examination of 
> the pyrolyzed log concerning the char in the center verses the char at the 
> edges, and % yield (by weight).
> 
> Paul
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Doc  /  Dr TLUD  /  Prof. Paul S. Anderson, PhD  
> Email:  [email protected]   
> Skype: paultlud      Phone: +1-309-452-7072
> Website:  www.drtlud.com
> 
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> 
> Subject:
> 
> RE: Whole log pyrolysis for char production was Re: [Gasification] Wood 
> heating in the UK - whole log gasification
> 
> Date:
> 
> Fri, 27 Dec 2013 08:50:06 +0100
> 
> From:
> 
> energiesnaturals <[email protected]>
> 
> Reply-To:
> 
> energiesnaturals <[email protected]>
> 
> To:
> 
> [email protected]
> 
>  
> 
> Hallo Paul,
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks for your interest in our living room stove/boiler!
> 
> Because that's what it is.
> 
> I build this one and quite a few more many years ago in the pre pellet area.
> 
> It is not really a big thing but just what i said in my 1. Description for 
> Ken.
> 
> An airtight firebox with controlled primary and secondary air, both preheated 
> by the non insulated air and water xchanger above the burning chamber.
> 
> The primary 60% is used to regulate the gasification ( remember it is an all 
> night heater on one log) and the secondary actually burns the develloping gas.
> 
> The escape hole is central in the dome. The admission pipes of 2.air are 
> offset and aimed at a 30 deg.downwards to create a turbulance and thus allow 
> for a quite complete combustion before the gas leaves the hot area. We use 
> mainly white pine, p.halepensis, airdried or so-so and we clean the conducts 
> every 2. year or so, it burns so clean.
> 
> After 1-3 h, depending on the log, you can find the remaining carbon in more 
> or less the shape of the log.
> 
> We do not use the char at present, cause it would be a mess to take it out 
> inside the living room...,but if we put in the last log around midnight and 
> close all the 1. And most of the 2nd air once it is lit, we are left with a 
> good bed of embers for toasting our breakfast bread.
> 
> If our aim was to produce char , i should have incorporated a movable floor( 
> no grate) to discharge it into a cooling device below or yes a grate and 
> create a repeating cycle without the need to light the batch every time.
> 
>  
> 
> (Un-)luckily i cannot provide any pictures right now, because we spend a 
> wonderful holydays at our doughter's in Budapest.
> 
> But if you want some, tell me after the 6th next year.
> 
> B.r.
> 
> Rolf
> 
> 
> Paul Anderson <[email protected]> escribió:
> 
> Dear Rolf,    (and hello to Greg!!)
> 
> I am very interested in your method of whole log gasification.   In 
> particular, I am interested in your statement that the pyrolysis occurs first 
> (or mostly first is fine), leaving the char to either be consumed (char 
> gasified) or removed.    My interest is in removing / saving the char for a 
> variety of other purposes, including possible use as biochar.    (I am 
> interested in using the heat, but that can be treated as a separate topic.)  
> 
> Therefore, I am sending this message to the Biochar Listserv.   But because 
> relatively few people subscribe to both lists, I (and Ron Larson and Tom 
> Miles) will relay your reply to the Biochar List.   Eventually these messages 
> could be taken off of the Gasification List and just continued with the 
> Biochar list, but let's see what develops.
> 
> Could you please provide some:
> some  photos,
> construction plans if available, 
>  and some data on what percentage of char is yielded from the dry weight of 
> the feedstock logs.
> 
> I am content with using cordwood that is smaller than the 45 cm diameter that 
> you mention, so any comments about the good or bad of using 10 cm or 25 cm 
> diameter feedstock would be appreciated.
> 
> Although as you say it is "a tad late", I will count your message and replies 
> among my most treasured presents received this year for Christmas!!
> 
> Paul
> 
> 
> Doc  /  Dr TLUD  /  Prof. Paul S. Anderson, PhD  
> Email:  [email protected]   
> Skype: paultlud      Phone: +1-309-452-7072
> Website:  www.drtlud.com
> On 12/26/2013 5:16 PM, energiesnaturals wrote:
> 
> Merry Christmas Ken and list ( I am aware that I am a tad late)
> 
>  
> 
> One way to burn whole logs like we do (45cm across x 55 cm long) in an 
> efficient way is to build a well closed ,dome shaped burning chamber out of 
> 15 cm fire brick and have individually regulated, preheated primary and 
> 2,dary air , at least 2 pipes either side.
> 
> You build up afire with kindling as you describe it and after 15 min you can 
> add  an entire log of pitchy pine and it will first gasify very nicely and 
> than burn the charcoal if you want.
> 
> The secret is to keep the  walls of the combustion chamber warm and do not 
> use them as heat xchangers!
> 
> You build a convenient xchanger above it and use the hot exhaust gas. Build 
> it large enough to reduce the exhaust temp to 90 deg C or less and you will 
> be way above 50 % eff. Ours has been working for 20+ years and is still doing 
> fine with 2 mm black steel pipes.
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> We never cut anything below 55 cm long and never split anything below 45 cm, 
> believe me or come and see!
> 
>  
> 
> Cheers and a happy new year
> 
>  
> 
> Rolf
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Enviado desde Samsung tablet
> 
> 
> Ken Boak <[email protected]> escribió:
> 
> Greg
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks for sharing.
> 
>  
> 
> I want to try a few ideas for myself to see if this is indeed possible on the 
> small split logs I can produce locally.
> 
>  
> 
> Our heating needs, and indeed modest on account of the mild climate here, but 
> I would like to find an efficient solution for all the thousands of acres of 
> neglected coppiced hardwood.  Cast iron victorian stoves may be quaint, but I 
> am sure there are ways to improve the overall efficiency with radical 
> redesign.
> 
>  
> 
> The main burner/heat exchanger on our 24kW gas boiler is no bigger than a 
> gallon paint tin.  Perhaps there is design lesson to be learned here
> 
>  
> 
> Anything to reduce mechanical handling and processing of wood fuels has to be 
> a step in the right direction
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Happy New Year 
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Ken
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> On 26 December 2013 19:22, Greg Manning <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Greetings Ken, and list members.
> 
>  
> 
> Ken, I'm going to point you to a video of the "underside" of a whole log (or 
> split) "cordwood as we call it here" stove that is a downdraft gasifier.
> 
>  
> 
> I can speak at length privately, however only somewhat on list, as this is a 
> proprietary design. 
> 
>  
> 
> Here's the link to the video:
> 
> http://youtu.be/DNYCfgEdYpg
> 
>  
> 
> Greg Manning
> 
>  
> 
> On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Ken Boak <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>  
> 
> Happy Christmas to the gasification list.
> 
>  
> 
> At this time of year, during the festive holiday season, I get a bit more 
> time to manage the running of our woodstove, as it rapidly warms the room and 
> produces a cheery effect.
> 
>  
> 
> Our property is fairly conventionally heated by natural gas, but a few years 
> back, I took the decision to invest in a woodstove with back-boiler, to 
> provide an alternative or back-up to the gas fired system.
> 
>  
> 
> The woodstove has a flat steel tank at the rear, the "back boilerr", in place 
> of a couple of the firebricks lining.  This circulates heated water entirely 
> by the thermosyphon principle to a radiator located in the bedroom/workroom 
> directly above the stove. So in effect the stove heats the living 
> room/kitchen area  directly, and the room upstairs by circulating hot water.
> 
>  
> 
> No electricity is required for circulation, and if worse-case we had an 
> extended power outage, this stove would provide heat and comfort in the two 
> main occupied areas of the house. Stoking it and attending it is often more 
> interesting than what is being shown on TV!
> 
>  
> 
> With a few days off work, I have had time to monitor the stove and make some 
> assessments of its overall performance. Its a fairly traditional stove,  a 
> rectangular box,, made from bolted together cast iron panels and partly lined 
> with firebrick. It's described as a multifuel stove - having been supplied 
> with a cast iron removable grate for burning coal - which is not used when 
> burning wood. It's approximately 24" wide, 12" deep and 18" tall.
> 
>  
> 
> In the UK, a common size for firewood logs, intended for the domestic 
> woodstove is about 10" (254mm) long, and equal to a 1/4 round taken from a 
> limb that may have been 5 or 6" in diameter.  The reason for this is that 
> there is a lot of coppiced hardwood, which has become mis-managed in the last 
> 20 years, so there are a lot of trees with 6" diameter shoots.  The 
> popularity of the "firewood processor" machine, means that a lot of this wood 
> is now coming on the market as domestic firewood, and sold to suburbanites at 
> vastly inflated prices (about $0.50 per kilo).
> 
>  
> 
> I am burning a mixture of kiln dried Silver Birch, and air dried other 
> species which includes ash, oak and sweet chestnut. The silver birch splits 
> well and makes excellent kindling.  One log is split into 8 or 10 kindling 
> sticks and these are built into a pyramid around 2 or 3 sheets of scrunched 
> up newspaper. Lighting is quick and easy - as the birch is kiln dried, and 
> within 5 minutes you will have a roaring fire and the larger logs can be 
> added.
> 
>  
> 
> The logs have an average weight of approximately 1 kg.  I have found that a 
> normal burn rate of these is two per hour.  I burn two at a time, and each 
> hour, add a further two to the burning char bed from the previous logs.  With 
> firewood having a calorific value of approximately 4kWh/kg - I estimate the 
> fuel input is in the order of 8 to 10kW.
> 
>  
> 
> Of course, with a traditional stove, so much of the heat energy is lost up 
> the chimney, and goes to create the draft.  The efficiency of the stove, 
> might be in the region of 50% - somewhat better than the open wood fire.  It 
> occurred to me that by way of a 2 stage gasification process, it would be 
> possible to increase the overall system efficiency, resulting in less wood 
> consumption, or more heat output per log.
> 
>  
> 
> This leads to a question - is it possible to design a gasifier aimed at 
> handling whole log gasification - where a log is 10" long and no more than 6" 
> across?  Can you recreate the temperatures, turbulence and reactants, found 
> within the combustion zone of the woodstove, and use this to thermally 
> process a single firewood log, at the rate of one every 30 minutes or so?
> 
>  
> 
> I've had some ideas on how this can be done, effectively using a length of 6" 
> diameter stovepipe/fluepipe to make a compact gasifier.  Logs would be loaded 
> in from the top, and the length of the pipe chosen to perhaps hold 4 logs at 
> any time - about 1m  (40") tall.  The bottom log would sit in the combustion 
> zone - so the end of this log is constantly under the action of the air 
> nozzles. The logs above are subjected to the elevated temperatures and begin 
> to pyrolise, char and split on their descent down the tube.
> 
>  
> 
> Beneath the combustion zone would be a fairly conventional hearth, and 
> reduction zone, with the char supported by a grate below that. For an overall 
> idea of the system - think of HS Mukundas open top gasifier.
> 
>  
> 
> Use of twin-wall stainless flue pipe would allow the air to be pre-heated in 
> the outer annulus - adding to the overall efficiency.  The hot syn-gas could 
> be burned in whatever appropriate burner geometry deemed necessary for either 
> radiant space heating or water heating with a suitable heat exchanger coil.
> 
>  
> 
> I hope to try to build a prototype of this over the next 10 days (a working 
> gasification holiday?)  and to see whether a log can be reduced in this 
> manner.  If all that is needed is heat, then the restrictions to produce a 
> tar free gas need not apply. If one can use whole logs, without having to 
> resort to woodchip - then this will be a considerable saving in mechanical 
> handling and wood processing.
> 
>  
> 
> At the end of the day - this gasifying stove needs to be as simple to operate 
> as the existing woodstove.  Reloading with a couple of logs each hour, and no 
> sophisticated need for fan- forced draft or electricity to operate. Draft 
> would come from the chimney as per now - about 25 to 30 feet, 6" diameter.
> 
>  
> 
> If anyone has experience of something similar - please let me know.
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Happy Holidays
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Ken
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
>       
> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus 
> protection is active.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gasification mailing list
> 
> to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
> [email protected]
> 
> to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
> http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_lists.bioenergylists.org
> 
> for more Gasifiers,  News and Information see our web site:
> http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org/
> _______________________________________________
> Gasification mailing list
> 
> to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
> [email protected]
> 
> to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
> http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_lists.bioenergylists.org
> 
> for more Gasifiers,  News and Information see our web site:
> http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org/
_______________________________________________
Gasification mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
[email protected]

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more Gasifiers,  News and Information see our web site:
http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org/

Reply via email to