Can someone enlighten us all as to 1) the Earths calcium and magnesium 
carbonate cycles and 2) any other significant carbon cycles in proportion. I 
know just enough to be dangerous and want it straight.

Dan Dimiduk 

Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID



Tom Miles <[email protected]> wrote:

International Biochar Initiative (IBI) spent several years developing a 
protocol for determining how to measure the forms of carbon and how to 
determine what carbon could be claimed for sequestration. The feedstock must be 
sustainable. The biochar must be safe (non-toxic). And only the stable portion 
of the char is counted. Details can be found on the IBI website. at 
www.biochar-international.org <http://www.biochar-international.org>    

 

The protocol was adopted last year (2015) by the California Association of Air 
Pollution Control Officers (CAPCOA) so it applies throughout California. 
http://www.ghgrx.org/ See the Biochar Production Project Reporting (Placer 
County APCD and ACR).   

 

The protocol was not adopted by the American Carbon Registry. I understand that 
the process is as much political as it is scientific and that the scientific 
premise of the proposed protocol is thought to be sound. 

 

The process took several years (2008-2015) and involved committees of 
scientists from around the world. It was developed with a large grant from a 
philanthropic organization. IBI has been unsuccessful at finding similar 
sources of funding to continue the work. (Philanthropic funding for climate 
change is now 20% of what It was in 2008.) Anyone with access to sources of 
funding, or ideas for funding, should contact IBI at 
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  

 

Donate to IBI so that it can continue to be an international center for biochar 
information and networking. http://www.biochar-international.org/ 

 

Kind regards,

 

Tom Miles

IBI Board member

 

 

From: Gasification [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Gerald Kutney
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 3:39 AM
To: Discussion of biomass pyrolysis and gasification 
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Gasification] Biochar - Carbon Negative?

 

While biomass is carbon neutral in principle, its use seldom is as the 
collection and processing of it is not.  The claim of carbon neutrality in the 
use of biomass has opened the industry to valid criticism as over-stating its 
benefits.  Bioenergy and biofuels are better than fossil fuels, but carbon 
neutrality is a hyperbole, in my opinion.

 

And while biochar is carbon negative in principle, not all of it is fixed and 
some appears to be vulnerable to biological activity.  Proving the degree of 
sequestration is challenging, and few jurisdictions have officially accepted 
this aspect of biochar.  

 

That said, bioenergy, biofuels and biochar are all (usually) beneficial to 
fight climate change (compared to fossil fuels), but we should be careful not 
to overstate the degree that this takes place.

 

 

Gerald Kutney, Ph.D.

Managing Director

Sixth Element Sustainable Management

“Innovation can move the world”

www.6esm.com <http://www.6esm.com>  (613) 425-0619

 

From: Gasification <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > on behalf of Anand 
Karve <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
Reply-To: Discussion of biomass pyrolysis and gasification 
<[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> >
Date: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 at 4:43 AM
To: Discussion of biomass pyrolysis and gasification 
<[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> >
Subject: Re: [Gasification] Biochar - Carbon Negative?

 

Dear Doug,

biomass is formed by the process of photosynthesis. Burning biomass is 
considered to be carbon neutral, because the carbon dioxide produced in this 
process was originally already in the atmosphere before it got sequestered in 
plants by photosynthesis. After being released into the atmosphere by burning, 
it would be sequestered again in plants by photosynthesis. Therefore, the 
carbon dioxide added to the atmosphere is zero. if any of the biomass is 
converted into char and buried into the soil, it creates a negative carbon 
dioxide balance, irrespective of the proportion of char going into the soil.

Yours

A.D.Karve




***
Dr. A.D. Karve

Chairman, Samuchit Enviro Tech Pvt Ltd ( <http://www.samuchit.com> 
www.samuchit.com)

Trustee & Founder President, Appropriate Rural Technology Institute (ARTI)

 

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Doug Williams < 
<mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]> wrote:

Hi Mark,

You ask:
> After gasification, approximately 5% of the woody biomass remains a biochar
> which sequesters carbon, hence a 'carbon negative' claim can be made.

Qualify which type of gasification, because 5% would only apply to a
high performance gas making system. If however it was a pyrolysing char
making system, about 1/3rd of the fuel weight would be char, but two
thirds would be consumed by combustion to become a CO2 emission. So not
honestly carbon negative in my opinion (other than replacing fossil
carbon). Restoration of the environmental CO2 balance would be a tricky
calculation.

> Alternatively, if the woody waste is left to rot in situ, the carbon
> sequestration is 0% (all carbon is released/transformed into CO2 and other
> gasses).

That fits the normal explanations, we all go back to CO2 and CH4 if
left to rot(:-)

> True?

Truth can be very elastic sided when claims are made about
gasification, so take care to confirm all calculations regarding the
process in question.There is a lot of attention paid to carbon credits
as an intensive to cheat in the Souther Hemisphere, and one should be
careful if included in any proposals.

Doug Williams,
Fluidyne.


_______________________________________________
Gasification mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
 <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
 
<http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_lists.bioenergylists.org>
 
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more Gasifiers,  News and Information see our web site:
 <http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org/> http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org/

 

_______________________________________________ Gasification mailing list to 
Send a Message to the list, use the email address  
<mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] to 
UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page  
<http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_lists.bioenergylists.org>
 
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_lists.bioenergylists.org
 for more Gasifiers, News and Information see our web site:  
<http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org/> http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org/ 

_______________________________________________
Gasification mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
[email protected]

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more Gasifiers,  News and Information see our web site:
http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org/

Reply via email to