Hi David and Bjorn,
I totally agree with what you both you say, but, David, even when proven
and wanted, most find that gasifiers and their ancillary equipment are
more than they can spend time running them.
Bjorn, you vanished years ago. Not still drying chips in your wifes oven
I hope.
Regards,
Doug Williams,
Fluidyne.
On 15/06/18 09:18, David Coote wrote:
On 15/06/2018 4:00 AM, [email protected]
wrote:
Thanks for that, Bjorn. Much appreciated.
I've been working as a renewable energy consultant doing cost and
performance modeling over the last ten years. Most clients don't want
an R&D project but rather cost-effective, reliable energy. Low GHG
emissions is an attractive feature but rarely in my experience the
only driver. PV is very attractive in that regard as it's low
maintenance, performance guarantees given site insolation are
relatively simple, the generation curve often fits commercial site
consumption patterns etc Some clients are prepared to take more of a
punt with kit that might need more attention but which will perform
within that operational envelope. The Spanner is looking interesting
in that context.
_______________________________________________
Gasification mailing list
to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
[email protected]
to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_lists.bioenergylists.org
for more Gasifiers, News and Information see our web site:
http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org/
